Carolyn: The artist Marc Quinn

Answer choices

1. A

   Out of Scope2% picked this

   should be considered to be

   Out of Scope: considered art Unsupported Disagree Position The discussion is about whether or not this can properly be called a portrait, not about whether it can properly be called art. We might think to ourselves, "well aren't portraits by definition art? So if someone believes it's a portrait, then don't they believe it's art?" Yes, we might be able to tolerate that common sense leap from what's said on the page (if this were our best available answer). But the person saying it isn't a portrait isn't committing to the idea that it isn't art. There are tons of things that aren't portraits but are still art. So we couldn't say that Carolyn thinks this DNA representation isn't art.

   2%
2. B

   Both Agree1% picked this

   should be considered to be Quinn’s

   Both Carolyn and Arnold would both agree that the object should be considered to be Quinn’s work.

   1%
3. C

   Half Scope19% picked this

   bears a recognizable resemblance to

   Carolyn would disagree with this statement, but Arnold does not address it.

   19%
4. D

   Half Scope1% picked this

   contains instructions according to which Sulston

   Arnold would agree with this statement, but Carolyn does not address it.

   1%
5. E

   Correct76% picked this

   is actually a portrait of

   Why this is right

   Arnold would agree with this statement, while Carolyn would disagree with it.

   Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   76%