Reading Comprehension

PT123 · S1 · P1 · Q5 Course Packs and Copyrights

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In a recent court case, a copy-shop owner was accused of violating copyright law when, in the preparation of “course packs”—materials photocopied from books and journals and packaged as readings for particular university courses—he copied materials without obtaining permission from or paying sufficient fees to the publishers.

Topic

A court case about whether a copy-shop owner violated copyright law by making and selling educational course packs without publisher permission.

Framework

Answer / Explain

Main Point

The court ruled that the copy-shop’s production of course packs for educational purposes did not violate copyright law, even though the owner profited, because the copying was not an exploitation of the copyrighted content itself. (Most valuable sentence appears at the end of paragraph 2: )

P1: Introducing the Case and Arguments

A copy-shop owner was accused of violating copyright law by selling course packs without permission or proper payment. He argued that getting permission is too hard and expensive, and that course packs let professors assign readings that students couldn’t otherwise afford. The twist: the shop made profits on these packs, which made this case different from the usual classroom "fair use" situations.

P2: Copyright Law, Publishers’ Arguments, and the Court’s Decision

Copyright law considers several factors to judge if copying material is fair—such as whether it’s for commercial or educational use, and how much it affects the market value of the work. The publishers said if copy shops stop paying fees, the value of scholarly works will drop. But the court found no real threat to the market and said it was more important that the copies were for education. The shop owner’s profit didn’t matter since the fee was based on number of pages copied, not the material's content.

P3: Court’s Reasoning and Final Takeaway

The court saw the copy shop’s actions as simply providing a service that makes copying easier and cheaper—not as taking unfair advantage of the authors’ creative work. Professors and students would be allowed to make these copies themselves, so it’s OK for them to use a third party like a copy shop to do it efficiently.

5.

Which one of the following describes a role most similar to that of professors in the passage who use copy shops to produce course packs?

  1. An artisan generates a legible

    Partial Match

    We have a person who makes a legal copy, then enlists a professional to make more copies. But we don't have anyone receiving the copies equivalent to the students. Additionally, the person making the copies is profiting themselves. That's a bad match for the professors, because it is the copy shop, not the professors themselves, who profit from the sale of the course packets.

    2% picked this

  2. Correct

    A choir director tapes a

    Why this is right

    The person in question makes a legal copy, then enlists a professional to reproduce it so it can be bought by individuals who are equivalent to her students.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    80% picked this

  3. A grocer makes several kinds

    Bad Match

    This lacks all the items necessary to be analogous. There is no legal copy made, no professional copying service enlisted, and no student-like group receiving the copies.

    7% picked this

  4. A professional graphic artist prints

    Bad Match

    This all the items necessary to be analogous. Are the copies made legally? We really don't know. Is there a professional copying service enlisted? Maybe, but maybe not. There is no student-like group receiving the copies, and they're being sold by the museum gift shop, not the copy shop.

    7% picked this

  5. A souvenir store in the

    Bad Match

    This lacks all the items necessary to be analogous. Are the copies made legally? We really don't know. Is there a professional copying service enlisted? Maybe, but maybe not. There is no student-like group receiving the copies, and they're being sold by the museum gift shop, not the copy shop.

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free