A physician has a duty to see to the health and best medical interests of the patient. On the other hand, the patient has a right to be fully informed about any negative findings concerning the patient’s health. When this duty conflicts with this right, the right should prevail since it is treating the patient as a mere object, not as a person.
What this question is testing
Your task
Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.
Common trap
Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.
Winning move
Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.