Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT122 S3 P3 Q18 Explanation

Women Doctors

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor's AttitudeSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Surviving sources of information about women doctors in ancient Greece and Rome are fragmentary: some passing mentions by classical authors, scattered references in medical works, and about 40 inscriptions on tombs and monuments. Yet even from these fragments we can piece together a picture. The evidence shows that in ancient Greece and de Romana’s licensure to practice general medicine, the earliest known officially recorded occurrence of this sort.

The very nature of the scant evidence tells us something. There is no list of women doctors in antiquity, no direct comment on the fact that there were such people. Instead, the scattering of references to them indicates that, although their numbers were probably small, women doctors were an unremarkable part of pointing to something that everyone could already see—that there were female doctors as well as male.

Moreover, despite evidence that some of these women doctors treated mainly female patients, their practice was clearly not limited to midwifery. Both Greek and Latin have distinct terms for midwife and doctor, and important texts and inscriptions refer to female practitioners as the latter. Other references provide evidence of a broad scope to another describes her as “savior of all through her knowledge of medicine.”

Also pointing to a wider medical practice are the references in various classical medical works to a great number of women’s writings on medical subjects. Here, too, the very nature of the evidence tells us something, for Galen, Pliny the elder, and other ancient writers of encyclopedic medical works quote the opinions simply give excerpts from the female authority’s writing without biographical information or special comment.

What this question is testing

Author's Attitude

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the author’s attitude toward the sources of information mentioned in

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope7% picked this

    wary that they might be misinterpreted due to their

    Out of Scope: wary of misinterpretation Word-bait: fragmentary We can't point to any text where the author sounds worried that people might misinterpret the significance of the stuff mentioned in the first sentence. This answer is just trying to entice us by saying the word "fragmentary".

  2. Out of Scope: crucial lingering questions14% picked this

    optimistic that with a more complete analysis they will yield answers to some

    This starts off somewhat tempting. The author does seem optimistic that we can piece together a picture from these fragments. But where in the passage does it talk about crucial lingering questions? Our author feels pretty settled on the takeaways: there were women doctors in ancient Greece and Rome and people were pretty accepting of it as a normal thing.

  3. Out of Scope: accepted as authentic2% picked this

    hopeful that they will come to be accepted generally by historians

    The passage is never making it seem like some people don't think these documents are authentic. People might question what inferences we can draw from these documents, but no one was questioning whether the documents themselves were authentic works of ancient authors.

  4. Correct77% picked this

    confident that they are accurate enough to allow for reliable

    Why this is right

    At first this seems a little over the top strong. "Even from these fragments we can piece together a picture" certainly seems to support that the author is confidence we can do something with this evidence. But "reliable factual inferences"? Is that too strong? Let's research our qualms. The 3rd sentence says, "The evidence (that we're being asked about) shows that in ancient Greece and Rome there were, in fact, female doctors". The author didn't say "the evidence suggests"; she said shows which means she really believes in the legitimacy of this takeaway. And the author literally says "There were, in fact" female doctors, so she is making factual inferences.

    Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope: new methodology1% picked this

    convinced of their appropriateness as test cases for the application of a new

    There isn't any talk in the passage of a new historical research methodology.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free