Reading Comprehension

PT122 · S3 · P3 · Q16 Women Doctors

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Surviving sources of information about women doctors in ancient Greece and Rome are fragmentary: some passing mentions by classical authors, scattered references in medical works, and about 40 inscriptions on tombs and monuments.

Topic

Women doctors in ancient Greece and Rome

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy

Main Point

Even though the evidence is fragmentary, there is clear proof that women were working as doctors (not just midwives) in ancient Greece and Rome, and their existence was considered a normal part of society. (Most Valuable Sentence: Towards the end of paragraph 1—)

P1: Fragments of Evidence for Ancient Women Doctors

The author introduces how little concrete information survives about women doctors in antiquity, but emphasizes that the available evidence—including literary references and inscriptions—clearly demonstrates that women worked as what we would now call physicians, long before the modern era.

P2: Social Context — Unremarkable but Real

The scattered nature of the evidence actually shows us something meaningful: women doctors, while not common, were viewed as a regular part of ancient life. Plato's casual mention of female doctors in support of a philosophical point is used to demonstrate that their presence wasn’t considered remarkable.

P3: Their Work Was Not Just Midwifery

The author argues that women doctors weren’t limited to delivering babies. Ancient languages had separate words for “doctor” and “midwife,” and surviving texts and epitaphs credit women with curing diseases and being knowledgeable healers—not just attending births.

16.

The primary function of the third paragraph of the passage is to

  1. Correct

    provide additional support for the

    Why this is right

    This aligns with our second formulation, and it reinforces the idea of "moreover". The moreover instructs the reader that this paragraph will be another supporting point for the overall thesis. 1st paragraph: in ancient Greece and Rome there were female medical personnel who were the ancient equivalent of what we now call medical doctors. 2nd paragraph: you can tell that female doctors were a normal thing because there isn't a lot of historical evidence saying, "Whoa, check out Tracy! She's a girl ... and a doctor?!" 3rd paragraph: you can tell that they were like normal doctors, not just midwives helping women, because they were called doctor not midwife and because there are inscriptions bragging about their wide-ranging practice.

    Skill tested: Paragraph Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    88% picked this

  2. suggest that the implications of

    Opposite

    The 3rd paragraph is not withdrawing from the 1st paragraph or qualifying it or retreating from it. It's adding further support, as indicated by the moreover.

    1% picked this

  3. acknowledge some exceptions to a

    Opposite

    The 3rd paragraph is not backpedaling from the 2nd paragraph. It's adding onto it, as indicated by the moreover.

    3% picked this

  4. emphasize the historical importance of

    Out of Scope: historical importance

    Nothing in the 3rd paragraph is emphasizing why the first two paragraphs are historically important. It's just saying, "I know what some of you are thinking --- 'female doctors? Shyeah, right. You probably just mean midwives'. But, no! We're talking full-fledged doctors."

    3% picked this

  5. describe the sources of evidence

    Out of Scope: sources of evidence

    The 3rd paragraph doesn't describe any sources of evidence from the 2nd paragraph. It presents a couple pieces of evidence to support it's claim that the practice of female doctors was not limited to midwifery. The sources of evidence in the 2nd paragraph are "a scattering of references to female doctors" and Plato's The Republic. Maybe people would be attracted to this answer thinking that the epitaph and "other references" cited in the 3rd paragraph were describing the "scattering of references" referenced in the 2nd paragraph. That would be a stretch, but even if true, there's no way we should be thinking that the point of this 3rd paragraph was to describe sources of evidence. The point of the 3rd paragraph was to rule out the possible objection that these "female doctors" were just midwives.

    5% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free