Technological improvements will enable food production to increase as populations increase.
Statements
Conditional (unless)
Signif Food production increase → societies more centralized
Volume Dial / Implicitly Causal (the more...the greater)
More centralized society >> greater percentage perish when it collapses
Causal (will exacerbat, will enable)
Centralizing society >> worsen disasters assoc (for sake of more food prod)) with societal collapse
Technological improvements >> More food production
Evaluate
Since Most Supported mainly deals with causality, it behooves us to interpret and assimilate this paragraph in a causal mentality. Do we understand the story we're being told?
We have technological improvements that allow us to produce more food, but they only work if we further centralize society, so we do. Unfortunately, the more centralized society is, the worse things are if society collapses.
The final sentence basically announces this causal chain, which means they're stealing our inference from us! We would have proudly picked an answer saying that the technological improvements ultimately led to society being more screwed in the event of a collapse. But they basically synthesized that story in the final sentence.
Goal
So, it's hard to predict what the answer will be saying, but it's very likely we'll be rewarded in some way for understanding this causal chain the paragraph was describing.