Reading Comprehension

PT121 · S3 · P3 · Q19 Canadian Courts and Cultural Property

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

Although the rights of native peoples of Canada have yet to be comprehensively defined in Canadian law, most native Canadians assert that their rights include the right not only to govern themselves and their land, but also to exercise ownership rights over movable cultural property—artifacts ranging from domestic implements to ceremonial costumes.

Topic

Native Canadian rights to cultural property and the tension between collective and private ownership concepts in Canadian law

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Canadian law has traditionally supported museums' claims to native cultural property based on private property concepts, but the author argues that the courts should recognize native Canadians' collective ownership rights instead. (Most Valuable Sentence: Last sentence of the last paragraph—author’s forward-looking statement about what the courts should do.)

P1: Introduction to the Dispute

The paragraph explains that although the legal rights of native Canadians are not well-defined, many believe their rights include self-governance as well as ownership of cultural artifacts. The law has typically favored museums, but native Canadians are now challenging this in court.

P2: Contrasting Ownership Concepts

This paragraph lays out the difference between the private-property approach of Canadian courts (favoring individual or group ownership with transferable rights) and the collective-ownership philosophy of native Canadians (where the community, not individuals, owns property, and rights can't be sold or inherited as personal possessions).

P3: Legal Hurdles and Future Recognition

This paragraph highlights the practical difficulty: native Canadians typically lack paperwork (required under private property law) to prove their ownership, so museums win claims. However, the author says that as courts realize that private property rules don’t always fit, they’ll start honoring native Canadians’ collective ownership claims to their cultural property.

19.

The passage most supports which one of the following statements about the tribal legal systems mentioned in the second paragraph of the passage?

  1. All tribes whose legal system

    Too Strong: all Reversed Logic

    We can't derive that 100% of tribes who use the concept of collective property have litigated to regain control over movable cultural property. The passage just said that 100% of tribes who have litigated to regain control over movable cultural property have used the concept of collective property.

    6% picked this

  2. Only tribes that have engaged

    Same as (A) Reversed Logic

    This is literally the same sentence as (A), which would tell you that they're both wrong. "Only" indicates the necessary condition, so just like (A), this would be diagrammed as if employs concept → engaged in litigation of collective property over control of movable property We were told the Reversed Logic version of this.

    9% picked this

  3. Correct

    All tribes that have engaged

    Why this is right

    We are told that "in all cases in which they've made legal claim to movable property they have done so by invoking this concept of collective ownership". So that would look like if engaged in litigation invoked concept over control of movable → of collective cultural property ownership This answer is just taking it one inferential step further: "if a tribal system invoked the concept of collective ownership, then they employ the concept of collective property". That's basically a self-justifying truth, so we're fine with that extra little language move.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    76% picked this

  4. All tribes whose legal system

    Too Strong

    Too Strong: all Out of Scope: can expect to win The only thing we can say about the "some tribes" that now recognize private property is that they have traditionally employed a concept of collective ownership and in all cases in which they've made legal claim to movable cultural property they've invoked the concept of collective ownership. Notice that all we know is past tense stuff. This answer is saying we can derive a forward-looking prediction that they can expect to win all their court cases!

    3% picked this

  5. Only those tribes whose legal

    Too Strong: only

    Did the author ever say about these tribes in the 2nd paragraph that "if they don't recognize the concept of private property, they can never expect to succeed in litigation over control of movable cultural property"? No, that's way stronger than anything we can find in the 2nd paragraph.

    6% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free