Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT121 S2 P4 Q23 Explanation

Leading Questions

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAnalogyLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Leading questions—questions worded in such a way as to suggest a particular answer—can yield unreliable testimony either by design, as when a lawyer tries to trick a witness into affirming a particular version of the evidence of a case, or by accident, when a questioner unintentionally prejudices the witness’s response. For this or unintentionally by lawyers, police investigators, reporters, or others with whom the witness has already interacted.

Recent studies have confirmed the ability of leading questions to alter the details of our memories and have led to a better understanding of how this process occurs and, perhaps, of the conditions that make for greater risks that an eyewitness’s memories have been tainted by leading questions. These studies suggest that processed as belonging to the original memory even if the witness actually saw no stop sign.

The farther removed from the event, the greater the chance of a vague or incomplete recollection and the greater the likelihood of newly suggested information blending with original memories. Since we can be more easily misled with respect to fainter and more uncertain memories, tangential details are more apt to become constructed armed robbery, but later those factors might be crucial to establishing the identity of the perpetrator.

What this question is testing

Analogy

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

In discussing the tangential details of events, the passage contrasts their original significance to witnesses with their possible significance in the courtroom (last paragraph). That contrast is most

Answer choices

  1. Weak Match2% picked this

    For purposes of flavor and preservation, salt and vinegar are important additions to cucumbers during the process of pickling, but these purposes could be

    We have something that is important to Thing 1, but we're missing the idea that this same thing is unimportant to Thing 2. We're really just saying that something is important, but not essential, to Thing 1 because there are other ingredients that could do the same thing. A correct answer would be something like "salt and vinegar are important additions to cucumbers for pickling, but they're unimportant additions to potato chips."

  2. Bad Match4% picked this

    For the purpose of adding a mild stimulant effect, caffeine is included in some types of carbonated drinks, but for the purposes of appealing

    We want to see that a certain Thing is tangential to one audience but crucial to another audience. Here, it's saying we add the Thing for a stimulant effect, or we subtract the Thing somewhere else for a health-conscious effect.

  3. Almost Matches9% picked this

    For purposes of flavor and tenderness, the skins of apples and some other fruits are removed during preparation for drying, but grape skins are

    We're talking about the same thing (fruit skin), but we're not saying it's tangential here but essential there. Instead, we're saying it's not wanted here but essential there. Details like hair length and shirt color weren't unwanted by the witnesses, they were just unimportant.

  4. Correct75% picked this

    For purposes of flavor and appearance, wheat germ is not needed in flour and is usually removed during milling, but for purposes of nutrition,

    Why this is right

    This ends up being our closest match. A certain thing (wheat germ) is not needed (i.e. tangential) in one context but it's important (i.e. crucial) in another context. I'm bothered by the fact that important isn't quite as strong as crucial, in that I think of 'crucial' as conveying 'necessary', whereas 'important' to me doesn't mean necessary. But this is still the best match we're offered.

    Skill tested: Analogy · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Weak Match10% picked this

    For purposes of texture and appearance, some fat may be removed from meat when it is ground into sausage, but the removal of fat

    This one, like (A), doesn't have two different entities or audiences. It's saying some Thing (fat) is removed for one reason (texture/appearance ... is that tangential?) and also removed for an important reason (health). If this answer had said, "removing fat from sausage is done for cosmetic reasons that don't really matter, whereas removing fat from milk is done for important health reasons". In the passage, a certain thing (hair style / shirt color) was unimportant in one setting but important in another setting. In this answer, a certain thing (removing fat) in one setting (sausage) has an unimportant (?) purpose and an important purpose.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free