Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT121 S1 Q7 Explanation

Enthusiasm for the use of

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Enthusiasm for the use of calculators in the learning of mathematics is misplaced. Teachers rightly observe that in some cases calculators enable students to focus on general principles rather than the tedious, largely rote calculations that constitute the application of these principles. But principles are more likely to be remembered when knowledge calculators make calculation easier, therefore, makes it reasonable to restrict their use.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens

Answer choices

  1. Weakens2% picked this

    Some students who know how to use calculators also thoroughly understand the mathematical principles

    This states that some students using calculators also understand the principles, which undermines the argument against calculator use by showing that calculators don't necessarily impede learning.

  2. No Impact1% picked this

    Slide rules, which are less technologically sophisticated analogues of calculators, were widely used in the learning of

    This hints that slide rules were used before calculators despite their limitations. It doesn't address the effectiveness of manual calculation vs. calculator use or the retention of principles, so it has no direct impact.

  3. Correct86% picked this

    It is much more important that students retain the knowledge of general principles than that this

    Why this is right

    This suggests that retaining knowledge is more important than merely acquiring it, reinforcing the argument that calculators, which hinder retention, should be limited. It emphasizes the downside of calculators by assigning greater value to the learning outcome that calculators supposedly compromise.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Weakens4% picked this

    Habits that are acquired by laborious and sometimes tedious practice are not as valuable as those

    This highlights that calculations done with practice (potentially manually) are less valuable than those mastered painlessly (potentially with calculators), which goes against the argument for restricting calculator use.

  5. Unclear Impact6% picked this

    Teachers’ enthusiasm for new educational aids is often not proportional to the pedagogical effectiveness

    We don't know whether this is a case of teachers' having disproportional enthusiasm, and even if it is, this answer wouldn't tell us whether they are being more or less enthusiastic than they should be, based on the pedagogical (i.e. teaching) effectiveness of calculators.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free