Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT121 S1 Q10 Explanation

The administration at a certain

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The administration at a certain university has explained this year’s tuition increase by citing increased spending on faculty salaries and on need-based aid to students. However, this year’s budget indicated that faculty salaries constitute a small part of the university’s expenditure, and the only significant increases in regardless of need. The administration’s explanation is not believable.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument that the administration’s explanation

Answer choices

  1. No Impact3% picked this

    With this year’s budget, the university has increased its total spending on scholarship aid

    This goes in the wrong direction, for our author, since scholarship aid did go up. Now naturally we know that the increase in scholarship aid was predominantly from academics-based aid, not need-based aid, but we got that from the existing premise. This answer itself isn't adding anything helpful to us. It isn't providing a different reason for the tuition increase, and it's not adding a new fact that makes us less likely to think the tuition increase came from more scholarship money to needs-based students.

  2. Weakens, if anything7% picked this

    With this year’s budget, the university increased the allotment for faculty salaries by 5 percent while tuition was

    The fact that the tuition went up (6%) by more than faculty salaries went up (5%) shows that the tuition increase is not fully explained by increased spending on faculty salaries. But it could still be largely explained by increased spending on faculty salaries, since the uptick in salary spending nearly matches the uptick in tuition. And the author was never saying that the uptick in tuition was wholly explained by spending on faculty salaries, just partially explained by it.

  3. Weakens8% picked this

    Faculty salaries at the university have increased in line with the national average, and substantial cuts in government student-loan programs have caused financial difficulties

    Both ideas mentioned here boost the plausibility of the administration's explanation. The fact that salaries have increased supports the idea of increased spending on faculty salaries. And the fact that the government has yanked some scholarship money to students who clearly need it (they are having financial difficulties without that aid) suggests that there was good reason for the university to potentially increase spending on need-based aid.

  4. Correct80% picked this

    Of the substantial items in the budget, the greatest increase was in administrative costs, facilities maintenance costs, and costs associated with

    Why this is right

    This strengthens the author's conclusion that "the increase in tuition was not due to higher spending on salaries and need-based it" by pointing to a potential Alternate Explanation for why tuition went up. The author can say, "Faculty salaries aren't a significant part of the budget. Meanwhile, admin costs, facilities maintenance, and athletics facilities are all major parts of the budget that increased. Thus, they are probably the main reason for the increase in tuition."

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. No Impact3% picked this

    Because enrollment projections at the university are very unreliable, it is difficult to accurately estimate the amount of money the university will collect

    The fact that it's hard to estimate how much money will come in from tuition fees doesn't have anything to do with this argument. This is a constant factor, not a variable one that affects this year differently from previous years. We can't use this answer to support an Alternate Explanation for why tuition increased. And we can't use this answer to diminish the plausibility that the tuition increase related to faculty salaries or need-based aid.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free