Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT120 S4 Q11 Explanation

Historian: One traditional childrearing practice

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Historian: One traditional childrearing practice in the nineteenth century was to make a child who misbehaved sit alone outside. Anyone passing by would conclude that the child had misbehaved. Nowadays, many child psychologists would disapprove of this practice because they believe that such practices damage the child’s self-esteem and that damage to traditional practice were, on average, as confident as adults not so raised.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: are incorrect14% picked this

    The beliefs of many present-day child psychologists about the consequences of loss of

    If we softened this to "may be incorrect" it's way safer. This answer is choosing one possible way of reconciling the 3rd and 4th sentences, but there are other possible ways (such as maybe they were right about the consequences of losing self-esteem but they were wrong to think that making a kid sit outside alone would damage their self-esteem). So we shouldn't sound so certain that psychologists were wrong about this thing.

  2. Out of Scope: most / least16% picked this

    Some of the most confident adults, as well as some of the least confident adults, were raised under

    We only hear that on average kids raised under the traditional practice end up about as confident as those not raised under that practice. We can't say anything more specific than that, like whether some of the most confident and least confident were among the traditional practice.

  3. Unsupported: incorrect inference3% picked this

    With the traditional childrearing practice, passersby did not always make correct inferences about children’s behavior

    To support this we just need one example in which a passerby assumed the kid sitting alone outside had misbehaved, but the kid had not misbehaved. But we have nothing like that to go off of.

  4. Out of Scope: most / highest3% picked this

    The most confident adults are those who developed the highest level of

    We hear that many psychologists think that damage to self-esteem makes one less confident as an adult. But we can't take that supposed causal connection and then extrapolate something about the superlative levels of confidence and self-esteem. More than one thing can affect our confidence and self-esteem as adults, so it's possible that the most confident adults aren't also the people with the highest self-esteem. I can say "getting parking tickets makes someone less rich", but that doesn't mean "The richest people are those who have gotten the fewest parking tickets".

  5. Correct64% picked this

    If children’s loss of self-esteem makes them less confident as adults, then the traditional childrearing practice in question did not tend to

    Why this is right

    This is similar but superior to (A), because it deals with possible ways to reconcile the pivot tension between the 3rd and 4th sentences. The psychologists were saying: Traditional ? loss of self ? loss of confidence practice esteem as adults It doesn't seem like the traditional practice led to less confident adults, so is that because the 1st causal link is wrong or because the 2nd causal link is wrong? This answer is staying agnostic about which one is wrong, but it's assuming that at least one of them is wrong. It's saying, "If that 2nd link is correct, then the 1st link is wrong". By contrapositive, "If the 1st link is correct, then that 2nd link is wrong". 2nd ? ~1st 1st ? ~2nd That means "at least one of these links is wrong".

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free