Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT120 S2 P4 Q21 Explanation

Pathogens

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Until recently, biologists were unable to explain the fact that pathogens—disease-causing parasites—have evolved to incapacitate, and often overwhelm, their hosts. Such behavior is at odds with the prevailing view of host-parasite relations—that, in general, host and parasite ultimately develop a benign coexistence. This view is based on the idea that parasites that resulting from the host’s incapacitation. This scenario suggests that even death-causing pathogens can achieve evolutionary success.

One implication of this perspective is that a pathogen’s virulence—its capacity to overcome a host’s defenses and incapacitate it—is a function of its mode of transmission. For example, rhinoviruses, which cause the common cold, require physical proximity for transmission to occur. If a rhinovirus reproduces so extensively in a solitary host that because it is transmitted directly, the common cold is unlikely to disable its victims.

The opposite can occur when pathogens are transported by a vector—an organism that can carry and transmit an infectious agent. If, for example, a pathogen capable of being transported by a mosquito reproduces so extensively that its human host is immobilized, it can still pass along its genes if a mosquito bites mosquito obtains a high dose of the pathogen, increasing the level of transmission to new hosts.

While medical literature generally supports the hypothesis that vector-borne pathogens tend to be more virulent than directly transmitted pathogens—witness the lethal nature of malaria, yellow fever, typhus, and sleeping sickness, all carried by biting insects—a few directly transmitted pathogens such as diphtheria and tuberculosis bacteria can be just as lethal. Scientists call to an average rhinovirus life span of hours—makes them among the most dangerous of all pathogens.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

With which one of the following statements about the prevailing view of host-parasite relations would the biologists mentioned in the first paragraph be

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: most3% picked this

    The view contradicts most evidence of actual

    The biologists are pointing out that it's possible for a parasite to have a non-benign relationship to its host and still achieve evolutionary success. They aren't claiming that more than 50% of actual host-parasite relations fall into this category. They might freely admit that 80% of parasites develop a benign coexistence. They're just saying it's not a given that all parasites will evolve towards benign coexistence.

  2. Opposite33% picked this

    The view suggests that even death-causing pathogens can achieve

    The biologists would say that, "The prevailing view fails to consider that even death-causing pathogens can achieve evolutionary success."

  3. Too Strong: does not exist1% picked this

    The view presumes the existence of a type of parasite behavior that

    This answer, like (A), makes it sound like the biologists are denying the idea that parasites and hosts often have benign coexistence. The prevailing view presumes the existence of benign parasite / host relationships. The biologists aren't arguing, "Nope. Such a thing does not exist." They're arguing. "Yes, but in addition there are also cases of non-benign parasite / host relationships."

  4. Correct61% picked this

    The view ignores the possibility that there is more than one way to

    Why this is right

    The biologists would say, "the prevailing view that a parasite achieves evolutionary success best by developing a benign relationship with the host where the host thrives ignores the possibility that a parasite could achieve evolutionary success alternatively by replicating in new hosts, even if it kills its hosts, as long as the rate of replication exceeded the rate of killing hosts." Thus, they'd say that the prevailing view is ignoring the possibility that parasites can still achieve evolutionary success even if they do not develop a benign coexistence with hosts, even if the host does not thrive.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Out of Scope: harming parasite1% picked this

    The view erroneously assumes that hosts never harm the parasites that

    The biologists would say, "This view erroneously assumes that parasites ultimately evolve so that they don't harm the host they're feeding off." The biologists, nor the passage, ever talk about the idea of the host harming the parasite.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free