Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT120 S2 P4 Q19 Explanation

Pathogens

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Until recently, biologists were unable to explain the fact that pathogens—disease-causing parasites—have evolved to incapacitate, and often overwhelm, their hosts. Such behavior is at odds with the prevailing view of host-parasite relations—that, in general, host and parasite ultimately develop a benign coexistence. This view is based on the idea that parasites that resulting from the host’s incapacitation. This scenario suggests that even death-causing pathogens can achieve evolutionary success.

One implication of this perspective is that a pathogen’s virulence—its capacity to overcome a host’s defenses and incapacitate it—is a function of its mode of transmission. For example, rhinoviruses, which cause the common cold, require physical proximity for transmission to occur. If a rhinovirus reproduces so extensively in a solitary host that because it is transmitted directly, the common cold is unlikely to disable its victims.

The opposite can occur when pathogens are transported by a vector—an organism that can carry and transmit an infectious agent. If, for example, a pathogen capable of being transported by a mosquito reproduces so extensively that its human host is immobilized, it can still pass along its genes if a mosquito bites mosquito obtains a high dose of the pathogen, increasing the level of transmission to new hosts.

While medical literature generally supports the hypothesis that vector-borne pathogens tend to be more virulent than directly transmitted pathogens—witness the lethal nature of malaria, yellow fever, typhus, and sleeping sickness, all carried by biting insects—a few directly transmitted pathogens such as diphtheria and tuberculosis bacteria can be just as lethal. Scientists call to an average rhinovirus life span of hours—makes them among the most dangerous of all pathogens.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

Which one of the following most accurately summarizes the main idea of

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: just as virulent Contradicted10% picked this

    A new hypothesis about the host-incapacitating behavior of some pathogens suggests that directly transmitted pathogens are just as virulent as vector-borne pathogens, due to

    The main clause here is that the New idea is that "directly transmitted are just as virulent as vector-borne". Yes, some directly transmitted (such as diphtheria and tuberculosis) are just as lethal / virulent. But the whole reason the author is writing this passage is to inform us of this general relationship they've now realized is going on in which "vector-borne tend to be more virulent than directly transmitted".

  2. Contradicted: most vs. some Wrong Emphasis2% picked this

    A new hypothesis about the host-incapacitating behavior of some pathogens suggests that, while most pathogens reproduce so extensively as to cause their hosts to

    The main clause of this answer is that there's a new hypothesis which says "some pathogens eventually develop a benign coexistence with their hosts". That's not the New idea. The benign coexistence is the Old, prevailing view. We'd rather hear this answer say, "while most pathogens develop a benign coexistence with their hosts, some pathogens may achieve evolutionary success even while reproducing so extensively as to cause their hosts to become gravely sick or even die". The main focus of the passage was the more-virulent pathogens, which are the exceptions not the usual. This answer also fails to mention the main takeaway, which is that there's a strong connection between mode of transmission and virulence.

  3. Wrong Justification12% picked this

    A new hypothesis about the host-incapacitating behavior of some pathogens suggests that they are able to achieve reproductive success because they reproduce to a

    This says that the big new takeaway is that some super virulent pathogens are able to still have reproductive success because they reproduce to a high level of concentration in their hosts. That is part of the story, but not enough. On its own, reproducing to a high level in the host just overwhelms, incapacitates, and potentially kills the host. The secret sauce of how this can be a successful evolutionary strategy is the idea of the vector (or in rare cases, the sit-and-wait capacity). The true measure of reproductive success is that "replication leads to a level of transmission into new hosts that exceeds the loss of pathogens resulting from the host's incapacitation."

  4. Opposite1% picked this

    A new hypothesis about the host-incapacitating behavior of some pathogens suggests that they are generally able to achieve reproductive success unless their reproduction

    This makes the New idea out to be, "some pathogens are able to achieve reproductive success unless their reproduction causes the death of the host". The main point was really, "some pathogens are able to achieve reproductive success even if their reproduction causes the death of the host", as long as they're being transmitted by a vector and so the level of transmission into new hosts exceeds the loss of pathogens resulting from the old host's death.

  5. Correct75% picked this

    A new hypothesis about the host-incapacitating behavior of some pathogens suggests that pathogen virulence is generally a function of their mode of transmission, with

    Why this is right

    According to the main clause of this answer, the New idea is that "pathogen virulence is generally a function of mode of transmission, with vector usually more virulent than direct". That looks like a really strong match for our Author's Take on the New, at the beginning of the final paragraph. This answer even adds a little qualifier idea at the end to wrap its arms around the exceptional cases of mean & nasty directly transmitted pathogens alluded to in the final paragraph.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free