Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT120 S2 P2 Q11 Explanation

Cultural Revolution Artistic Effects

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The Cultural Revolution of 1966 to 1976, initiated by Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong in an attempt to reduce the influence of China’s intellectual elite on the country’s institutions, has had lasting repercussions on Chinese art. It intensified the absolutist mind-set of Maoist Revolutionary Realism, which had dictated the content and style reality artists could portray was one that had been thoroughly colored and distorted by political ideology.

Ironically, the same set of requirements that constricted artistic expression during the Cultural Revolution has had the opposite effect since; many artistic movements have flourished in reaction to the monotony of Revolutionary Realism. One of these, the Scar Art movement of the 1980s, was spearheaded by a group of intellectual painters who as outstanding or perfect, the Scar artists chose instead to portray the bleak realities of modernization.

As the 1980s progressed, the Scar artists’ radical approach to realism became increasingly co-opted for political purposes, and as this political cast became stronger and more obvious, many artists abandoned the movement. Yet a preoccupation with rural life persisted, giving rise to a related development known as the Native Soil movement, which romanticize certain qualities of rural Chinese society in order to appeal to Western galleries and collectors.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
11.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following views of

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: inevitable12% picked this

    Its development was the inevitable consequence of the Scar Art movement’s

    The author does think that there was a backlash to the increasing politicization of Scar Art, which led many to abandon it. But she doesn't announce any causal connection as strong as "Native Soil was an unavoidable / inevitable / foregone conclusion once Scar Art starting getting more political." She actually identifies the main impetus of Native Soil as "a preoccupation with rural life", not a disgust with Scar Art's politicization.

  2. Out of Scope8% picked this

    It failed to earn the wide recognition that Scar Art

    Out of Scope: Scar Art's wide renown This makes an unsupported comparison about how widely recognized Scar Art vs. Native Soil was. The passage never gives us any way to compare how widely they were recognized. We have no information about how popular Scar Art was / wasn't with the general population. Just because Native Soil ended up being trivialized doesn't mean it didn't earn at least as wide recognition as Scar Art had when it first came onto the scene.

  3. Too Strong: most2% picked this

    The rural scenes it depicted were appealing to most people

    We have no idea to what extent the majority of people in China liked or disliked Native Soil. The only sentiment we have that approaches information regarding how well it was / wasn't received is actually a negative one in the final sentence.

  4. Out of Scope22% picked this

    Ironically, it had several key elements in common with Revolutionary Realism, in opposition to which

    Out of Scope: several things in common The only thing we might be able to say the two movements had in common is that they both idealized. Revolutionary Realism idealized socialist life. Native Soil idealized rural peasant life. But "several" implies at least three things, and there isn't really any grounds for citing any other similarities between the two movements.

  5. Correct57% picked this

    Its nostalgic representation of rural life was the means by which it stood in opposition

    Why this is right

    We can match this to a line in our Support Window, the second to last sentence of the passage: the Native Soil painters reacted to the ideological rigidity of the Cultural Revolution by idealizing traditional peasant life How do we know that "reacted to" should be thought of as "in opposition to"? If we go back to the beginning of the 2nd paragraph, it sets up the framing idea for the rest of the passage: many artistic movements have flourished in reaction to the monotony of Revolutionary Realism Again, it's saying "reacting to" not "opposition to", but the word monotony is negative. Reacting to a negative is generally to oppose that negative thing. Similarly, in the second to last line of the passage, it says they're reacting to the rigidity, which is also a negative word.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free