Reading Comprehension

PT120 · S2 · P2 · Q11 Cultural Revolution Artistic Effects

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The Cultural Revolution of 1966 to 1976, initiated by Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong in an attempt to reduce the influence of China’s intellectual elite on the country’s institutions, has had lasting repercussions on Chinese art.

Topic

The influence of the Cultural Revolution on Chinese art and the artistic movements that emerged in response to it.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

The restrictive, politicized artistic rules of the Cultural Revolution initially limited artistic expression in China, but these same constraints later inspired a wave of new, more personally and socially critical styles of art, such as the Scar Art and Native Soil movements—though even these new movements faced their own limitations and commercial pressures. (The Most Valuable Sentence is the opening of paragraph 2: )

P1: The Cultural Revolution’s Artistic Restrictions

We learn how the Cultural Revolution forced Chinese artists to follow strict political rules, only depicting a government-approved reality and forbidding nonpolitical or independent subjects. Art was used as a propaganda tool, with the government defining "truth."

P2: The Rise of Scar Art—A New Kind of Realism

Ironically, those same restrictions later sparked creative reactions. After being exiled to rural areas, artists started Scar Art in the 1980s, rejecting government-sanctioned perfection and choosing instead to represent the grim, real-life struggles of rural China. Scar Art focused on ordinary, individual experiences rather than grand, idealized scenes.

P3: Evolution and Commercialization—Native Soil Movement

As Scar Art became politicized, some artists moved on to the Native Soil movement, which focused more on nostalgia and celebrating traditional peasant life. However, this newer style also lost some authenticity, as it began to idealize rural China partly to attract Western art buyers.

11.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following views of the Native Soil movement?

  1. Its development was the inevitable

    Too Strong: inevitable

    The author does think that there was a backlash to the increasing politicization of Scar Art, which led many to abandon it. But she doesn't announce any causal connection as strong as "Native Soil was an unavoidable / inevitable / foregone conclusion once Scar Art starting getting more political." She actually identifies the main impetus of Native Soil as "a preoccupation with rural life", not a disgust with Scar Art's politicization.

    13% picked this

  2. It failed to earn the

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: Scar Art's wide renown This makes an unsupported comparison about how widely recognized Scar Art vs. Native Soil was. The passage never gives us any way to compare how widely they were recognized. We have no information about how popular Scar Art was / wasn't with the general population. Just because Native Soil ended up being trivialized doesn't mean it didn't earn at least as wide recognition as Scar Art had when it first came onto the scene.

    8% picked this

  3. The rural scenes it depicted

    Too Strong: most

    We have no idea to what extent the majority of people in China liked or disliked Native Soil. The only sentiment we have that approaches information regarding how well it was / wasn't received is actually a negative one in the final sentence.

    1% picked this

  4. Ironically, it had several key

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: several things in common The only thing we might be able to say the two movements had in common is that they both idealized. Revolutionary Realism idealized socialist life. Native Soil idealized rural peasant life. But "several" implies at least three things, and there isn't really any grounds for citing any other similarities between the two movements.

    21% picked this

  5. Correct

    Its nostalgic representation of rural

    Why this is right

    We can match this to a line in our Support Window, the second to last sentence of the passage: the Native Soil painters reacted to the ideological rigidity of the Cultural Revolution by idealizing traditional peasant life How do we know that "reacted to" should be thought of as "in opposition to"? If we go back to the beginning of the 2nd paragraph, it sets up the framing idea for the rest of the passage: many artistic movements have flourished in reaction to the monotony of Revolutionary Realism Again, it's saying "reacting to" not "opposition to", but the word monotony is negative. Reacting to a negative is generally to oppose that negative thing. Similarly, in the second to last line of the passage, it says they're reacting to the rigidity, which is also a negative word.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    57% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free