Reading Comprehension

PT120 · S2 · P1 · Q3 The Downstate Campaign

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In 1963, a three-week-long demonstration for jobs at the construction site of the Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York, became one of the most significant and widely publicized campaigns of the civil rights movement in the United States.

Topic

The 1963 Downstate Medical Center protest in Brooklyn led by African American ministers and its impact on the civil rights movement.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy (with a touch of Problem / Solution)

Main Point

The Downstate Medical Center protest was a milestone civil rights action led by politically moderate African American ministers, who balanced activism with continued engagement in established political channels; this set a precedent for future civil rights leadership in northern cities. The key "Most Valuable Sentence" encapsulating the main point appears near the end of the last paragraph:

P1: Introduction to the Downstate Protest

This paragraph introduces the Downstate protest as an influential and widely publicized civil rights campaign in Brooklyn. It highlights the unusual leadership of locally based, previously moderate African American ministers, describes how they organized and funded the protest through their congregations, and outlines their goal of forcing changes to discriminatory government and union hiring policies.

P2: The Ministers’ Role and the Risks They Took

Here we learn why national civil rights organization CORE encouraged the ministers to lead the protest and how the ministers' involvement broke with their traditionally moderate, politically connected roles. The paragraph discusses the tension between their new activism and their established positions, emphasizing that by leading the protest, they risked losing political influence and community trust.

P3: Outcomes and Broader Significance

The final paragraph sums up the results: although the protest didn't achieve all its demands, it did secure promises to enforce existing anti-discrimination laws and brought public attention to job discrimination in the North. Critically, the ministers preserved their moderate standing while being effective activists, creating a model for future civil rights leadership.

The primary function of the reference to past activities of ministers and churches (third sentence of the second paragraph) is to

demonstrate that the tactics used
Opposite
The big idea we're trying to reinforce is that the ministers' involvement in the Downstate campaign represented something new / risky for them. That sounds like the opposite of "evolved naturally out of their previous activities". If we changed this answer to say that "the goals of the leaders evolved naturally" that would work fine. The highlighted text is showing us that the ministers have always had the goal of helping their community address social / political / economic concerns. But the tactics of civil disobedience are radical, not moderate. They aren't any longer working through established political channels.
12% picked this
explain why the leaders of
Unsupported Purpose
The highlighted text talks about what the ministers had been doing in the community for the last few decades. It doesn't offer any reason why they are doing something radically different when it comes to how they're conducting the Downstate campaign (i.e. using civil disobedience rather than working through established political channels as they've always previously done).
11% picked this
provide examples of the sorts
Out of Scope: CORE promoted
The highlighted text has nothing to do with CORE. It describes what the ministers were doing in the decades prior to when CORE reached out to talk to them.
8% picked this
indicate how the Downstate campaign
Unsupported Purpose
The author never suggests that the choice to use civil disobedience was an unnecessary one, or that the ministers could have accomplished their goals at least as well by working with community and government organizations, through established political channels. This paragraph is telling us that for these ministers, the means used were different from the norm. This answer is telling us that the means used weren't important or crucial.
1% picked this
Correct
underscore the extent to which
Why this is right
This reinforces the "Bookend" ideas, as we expect on Local Purpose questions. Both before and after the highlighted text, the paragraph is conveying the idea that "by doing civil disobedience, ministers were jeopardizing/risking their reputations and political careers", which implies that they are doing something that is at odds with their reputation / with their customary approach. The highlighted text shows a group of ministers working in a moderate way within established political channels. The Downstate campaign used civil disobedience, which is nothing like their previous tactics. It's sort of analogous to a middle-manager who for decades tried to improve conditions for her subordinates by having many meetings and conferences with the top brass, but then one day she decides to tell her employees that they all should go on strike.
Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
67% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free