Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT120 S1 Q9 Explanation

Film historians have made two

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Film historians have made two major criticisms of Depression-era filmmakers: first, that they were too uncritical of the economic status quo; and second, that they self-indulgently created films reflecting their own dreams and desires. However, these filmmakers made their movies with an eye to profit, and so they provided what their audiences a care in the world. Thus, the second criticism cannot be accurate.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
9.

The conclusion of the argument follows logically if which one of the

Answer choices

  1. Too Weak2% picked this

    To avoid self-indulgence, filmmakers should take a critical stance toward the existing economic system and should allow audiences to

    This is a guideline for someone who wants to avoid self-indulgence. We need a rule that says, "If x is true, then you did not self-indulgently make films". Even if someone satisfied both conditions here, (1. take critical stance toward existing economic system, 2. allows audiences to form their own personal aspirations), that wouldn't prove that you have avoided self-indulgence. Similarly, if I said "to get into Harvard, students should apply as early as possible and submit at least one letter of recommendation" that wouldn't mean that satisfying those two conditions guarantees that you get into Harvard.

  2. Unrelated to Goal1% picked this

    It is unjustified to demand of all filmmakers that their films engage in criticism of

    We need a rule that says, "If x is true, then you did not self-indulgently make films reflecting your own dreams / desires". This answer doesn't have any of that necessary conclusion language.

  3. Unrelated to Goal3% picked this

    The people who regularly went to movies during the Depression were those likely to have been most satisfied

    We need a rule that says, "If x is true, then you did not self-indulgently make films reflecting your own dreams / desires". This answer doesn't have any of that necessary conclusion language.

  4. Unrelated to Goal1% picked this

    Depression-era filmmakers who did not make films for profit could not take radical critical stances toward then-current

    We need a rule that says, "If x is true, then you did not self-indulgently make films reflecting your own dreams / desires". This answer doesn't have any of that necessary conclusion language.

  5. Correct93% picked this

    It cannot be self-indulgent for a filmmaker to give an audience what

    Why this is right

    This is the only answer with a proving mechanism for the wording in our conclusion, that the filmmakers "did not self-indulgently create films reflecting their own dreams and desires". This says filmmaker gives an audience ? cannot be what it most wants self-indulgent We were told that the Depression-era filmmakers provided what their audiences most wanted in a film. According to this rule, it cannot have been self-indulgent for the filmmakers to have done this. So we have proven that the Depression-era filmmakers were not self-indulgently creating films. Since this was the only answer that provided the New Concept in the Conclusion (only choice A otherwise had anything about self-indulgence), this was the only answer really worth reading or thinking about.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free