Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT120 S1 Q12 Explanation

All known living things are

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsSufficient Assumption

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

All known living things are made of the same basic kinds of matter, are carbon based, and are equipped with genetic codes. So human life all other known life.

What this question is testing

Sufficient Assumption

Your task

Find the assumption that, if added, guarantees the conclusion follows.

Common trap

Answers that only partly bridge the gap, leaving the conclusion unproven.

Winning move

Identify the new term in the conclusion and pick the choice that links it to the evidence.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
12.

The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following

Answer choices

  1. Unrelated to Goal3% picked this

    Without the existence of other life forms, human life would never have

    This is not a rule that can prove "same origin", so it's functionally useless to us. We need some proving-mechanism for "same origin", like if xyz is true ? same origin On Sufficient Assumption, the correct answer combines with some piece(s) of existing evidence and allows us to derive the conclusion. We can't derive "same origin" if neither the evidence nor the answer choice use that term.

  2. Unrelated to Goal9% picked this

    There are not any living beings that have genetic codes but are

    This is not a rule that can prove "same origin", so it's functionally useless to us. We need some proving-mechanism for "same origin", like if xyz is true ? same origin On Sufficient Assumption, the correct answer combines with some piece(s) of existing evidence and allows us to derive the conclusion. We can't derive "same origin" if neither the evidence nor the answer choice use that term.

  3. Unrelated to Goal6% picked this

    There can never be any living thing that does not have

    This is not a rule that can prove "same origin", so it's functionally useless to us. We need some proving-mechanism for "same origin", like if xyz is true ? same origin On Sufficient Assumption, the correct answer combines with some piece(s) of existing evidence and allows us to derive the conclusion. We can't derive "same origin" if neither the evidence nor the answer choice use that term.

  4. Unrelated to Goal1% picked this

    Many yet-to-be-discovered types of living things will also be

    This is not a rule that can prove "same origin", so it's functionally useless to us. We need some proving-mechanism for "same origin", like if xyz is true ? same origin On Sufficient Assumption, the correct answer combines with some piece(s) of existing evidence and allows us to derive the conclusion. We can't derive "same origin" if neither the evidence nor the answer choice use that term.

  5. Correct80% picked this

    Any two living things made of the same basic kinds of matter have

    Why this is right

    Can it really be this easy? They're only giving us one answer that has the Conclusion's wording in it? Yes, it can! That's the joy of Sufficient Assumption. The correct answer combines with stuff we know from the evidence to allow us to derive the conclusion. If we're concluding something about "Z", then either the premise or the correct answer needs to mention Z. So if the premises never mentioned Z, then the correct answer absolutely has to. This gives us a proving-mechanism for "same origin": If two living things are then they have made of the same basic ? the same origin kinds of matter We know that human life is made of the same basic kinds of matter as all other known life (since all known living things are made of the same basic kinds of matter). According to this rule, if two things are made of the same basic matter, then they have the same origin. So this proves that human life has the same origin as all other life.

    Skill tested: Sufficient Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free