Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT12 S4 Q24 Explanation

The problem that environmental economics aims

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsEvaluate

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is the following: people making economic decisions cannot readily compare environmental factors, such as clean air and the survival of endangered species, with other costs and benefits. As environmental economists recognize, solving this problem requires assigning monetary values to environmental factors. But monetary values at economic decisions. Thus, environmental economics is stymied by what motivates it.

What this question is testing

Evaluate

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
24.

If the considerations advanced in its support are true, the passage’s conclusion

Answer choices

  1. Correct63% picked this

    strongly, on the assumption that monetary values for environmental factors cannot be assigned unless people make economic

    Why this is right

    Answer A is correct.

    Skill tested: Evaluate · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap4% picked this

    strongly, unless economic decision-making has not yet had any effect on the things categorized

  3. Trap13% picked this

    at best weakly, because the passage fails to establish that economic decision-makers do not by and large take

  4. Trap4% picked this

    at best weakly, because the argument assumes that pollution and other effects on environmental factors rarely

  5. Trap16% picked this

    not at all, since the argument is circular, taking that conclusion as one

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free