Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT12 S3 P4 Q23 Explanation

Serotonin

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

How does the brain know when carbohydrates have been or should be consumed? The answer to this question is not known, but one element in the explanation seems to be the neurotransmitter serotonin, one of a class of chemical mediators that may be released from a presynaptic neuron and that cause the serotonin-mediated transmission often have the opposite effect: they often induce carbohydrate craving and consequent weight gain.

Serotonin is a derivative of tryptophan, an amino acid that is normally present at low levels in the bloodstream. The rate of conversion is affected by the proportion of carbohydrates in an individual’s diet: carbohydrates stimulate the secretion of insulin, which facilitates the uptake of most amino acids into peripheral tissues, such the central nervous system where, in a special cluster of neurons, it is converted into serotonin.

The level of serotonin in the brain in turn affects the amount of carbohydrate an individual chooses to eat. Rats that are allowed to choose among synthetic foods containing different proportions of carbohydrate and protein will normally alternate between foods containing mostly protein and those containing mostly carbohydrate. However, if rats are their brains fail to respond when carbohydrates are eaten, so the desire for them persists.

In human beings a serotoninlike drug, d-fenfluramine (which releases serotonin into brain synapses and then prolongs its action by blocking its reabsorption into the presynaptic neuron), selectively suppresses carbohydrate snacking (and its associated weight gain) in people who crave carbohydrates. In contrast, drugs that block serotonin-mediated transmission or that interact with neurotransmitters that serotonin has other effects that may be useful indicators of serotonin levels in human beings.

What this question is testing

Inference

Topic

The author is answering a biology question: how does the brain know when you've had enough carbs (or that you need more)? Serotonin is the key.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy. The author isn't arguing against opponents — they're building up an explanation step by step, with chemistry, animal studies, and human studies.

Main Point

Here's the simpler version: when you eat carbs, your body releases insulin, which clears most amino acids out of the bloodstream — but not tryptophan. That gives tryptophan more room to enter the brain, where it gets converted into serotonin. Serotonin then signals to the brain that you've had enough carbs. Drugs that boost serotonin reduce carb craving; drugs that block it leave you craving more. Studies in rats and in humans both back this up.

P1: The big finding

Drugs that increase serotonin tend to cause weight loss. Drugs that block it cause carb craving and weight gain. So serotonin is part of the brain's answer to "have I had enough carbs?"

P2: The chemistry, in plain terms

Eating carbs triggers insulin. Insulin clears most amino acids from the blood — but tryptophan stays. With less competition, more tryptophan crosses into the brain, where the brain converts it into serotonin.

P3: Rats prove it works

Given a choice, rats normally bounce between protein and carb foods. If you give them serotonin-boosting drugs, they cut back on carbs. If you block serotonin, the brain never registers the carbs they did eat, so they keep craving them.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
23.

It can be inferred that a person is likely to crave

Answer choices

  1. Contradicted Causal Relationship1% picked this

    the amount of insulin produced is

    If you've done your research or remember that blocking serotonin is what causes carb cravings, you should be able to quickly put A in the "probably not" bucket and continue looking for a match to your prediction. That's a more efficient approach than trying to confirm A is wrong with research. If you do need to research A, though, the target "insulin" puts you in P2, and the causal chain communicated there is that as insulin goes up, we uptake more amino acids. But tryptophan is an outlier. It isn't impacted by insulin rise and so as we uptake more of the other amino acids, we're left with relatively more tryptophan. That leads to more tryptophan crossing the blood brain barrier where it is converted to serotonin, and serotonin is the thing that prevents carb cravings, not the thing that causes them. That's why this answer is ultimately a contradiction.

  2. Correct80% picked this

    the amount of serotonin in the brain is

    Why this is right

    This aligns with our research and prediction: blocking serotonin leads to carb cravings. It's not exactly 100% the same, but we can reasonably infer that blocking serotonin leads to low amounts in the brain, so this answer should seem well-supported on your first pass and end up in your "like it" bucket. Confirm it's correct by eliminating the other answers.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Contradicted Causal Relationship4% picked this

    more tryptophan than usual crosses the

    As we discovered researching A, more tryptophan crossing the blood brain barrier where it is converted to serotonin prevents carb cravings rather than causes them.

  4. Unsupported: interrupted13% picked this

    neurotransmission by neurotransmitters other than serotonin

    Boy this one is tricky. If you researched the P4 target in your initial research, you saw that "drugs that block serotonin-mediated transmission or that interact with neurotransmitters other than serotonin have the opposite effect: they often induce carbohydrate craving." But drugs interacting with those other neurotransmitters is not necessarily the same as neurotransmission by those neurotransmitters being interrupted. That subtle difference makes D less supported than B.

  5. Contradicted Causal Relationship1% picked this

    amino acids other than tryptophan are taken up by

    As we saw in our research target for A, as we uptake more of the other amino acids, we're left with relatively more tryptophan. That leads to more tryptophan crossing the blood brain barrier where it is converted to serotonin, and serotonin is the thing that prevents carb cravings, not the thing that causes them.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free