The ability to access information

Answer choices

1. A

   Weak Impact4% picked this

   A computerized speech synthesizer is often less expensive than a complete

   This somewhat helps Team Computer, because it's saying it would often be cheaper to buy the hardware hookup that can make your computer read information aloud than it would to purchase a complete library of audiotapes. But it's not a super impactful idea, since the quantifier often is sort of like many / frequently / commonly. They all mean that there are a plurality of cases in which this is true, but none of them mean that in a majority of cases it's true. So since this answer leaves the door open for the idea that "most of the time the complete library of audiotapes is cheaper, even though often times it can be more expensive", it doesn't do much Also, do people really need to buy a complete library of audiotapes? Couldn't they just buy audiotapes on demand for the resources they want? It's not clear that this head-to-head comparison even pertains to most visually impaired people, because it's a pretty big jump to assume they'd be shopping for a complete library of audiotapes. We can keep this on a first pass because it's not nothing, but we should be expecting to find a correct answer with more impact.

   4%
2. B

   Correct89% picked this

   Relatively easy-to-use computer systems that can read information aloud, display it in large type, or produce a braille version

   Why this is right

   This has much more punch than (A). Sometimes the easiest way to feel the impact of a strengthen answer is to toggle over to its opposite. If we said "easy-to-use computer systems that can do all this stuff for visually impaired people are in very scarce supply" that would badly weaken. Even if this technology is rad, if it's hard to find, then it's hard for the author to argue that visually impaired people can now access info more easily from computers. So the fact that this is saying "this rad technology is widely available and relatively easy to use" helps the author's case. It's attainable and it doesn't involve a lot of training or expertise? That sounds pretty easy to access!

   Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   89%
3. C

   Trap1% picked this

   Many visually impaired people prefer traditional sources of information to computers that can read information aloud, display it in large type, or

   Weakens, if anything Out of Scope: prefer The subject matter of the conclusion is really about "ease of access" not which medium visually impaired people "prefer to use". So it doesn't really make any difference to this argument which source visually impaired people prefer. But, if anything, this is saying they prefer the traditional sources, so it's going the wrong way. We're trying to strengthen a conclusion that favors Team Computer, not Team Traditional Sources.

   1%
4. D

   Weakens, if anything2% picked this

   Most visually impaired people who have access to information via computer also have access to this same information

   This doesn't tip the scales in either direction. It actually makes it sound like computers and traditional sources are providing similar information to visually impaired people. It sounds like most of the people who may have 'switched' to computer access aren't really gaining access to any new information they didn't have via traditional sources. Since the conclusion is saying that accessing information is easier with computers, whereas this answer is saying "computers and traditional sources are providing access to the same information", it feels more like a weakener.

   2%
5. E

   Out of Scope: future4% picked this

   The rate at which printed information is converted into formats easily accessible to visually impaired

   This strengthens the notion that "in the future, it will be easier to access info via computer", but the future tense doesn't matter to us. This conclusion is saying "visually impaired people can now access info more easily".

   4%