Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT119 S1 P2 Q14 Explanation

Joy Kogawa’s Obasan

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Joy Kogawa’s Obasan is an account of a Japanese-Canadian family’s experiences during World War II. The events are seen from the viewpoint of a young girl who watches her family disintegrate as it undergoes the relocation that occurred in both Canada and the United States. Although the experience depicted in Obasan is is achieved through the novel’s form and the latter through the symbols it employs.

The form of the novel parallels the three-stage structure noted by anthropologists in their studies of rites of passage. According to these anthropologists, a rite of passage begins with separation from a position of security in a highly structured society; proceeds to alienation in a deathlike state where one is stripped of screens of silence and secretiveness that have enshrouded her past, and reconciles herself with her history.

Kogawa’s use of motifs drawn from Christian rituals and symbols forms a subtle critique of the professed ethics of the majority culture that has shunned Naomi. In one example of such symbolism, Naomi’s reacquaintance with her past is compared with the biblical story of turning stone into bread. The bundle of documents—which of many Japanese Canadians—into a journey of heroic transformation and a critique of the majority culture.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

The passage suggests that Joy Kogawa believes which one of the following about the society

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope: discouraged from heritage21% picked this

    It discouraged its citizens from seeking out

    We don't have any text to support the idea that the majority culture tried to discourage Japanese Canadians from seeking out their Japanese roots.

  2. Out of Scope: thwarting transformation9% picked this

    It endeavored to thwart its citizens’ attempts at

    We don't have any text to support the idea that the majority culture tried to discourage Japanese Canadians from their attempts at heroic transformation. This is just a Word Salad that is grabbing "heroic transformation" from the 2nd paragraph, where we were talking about the way in which the narrative parallel the 3-part structure of rites of passage (by the end of this rite of passage, the subject has made a heroic transformation).

  3. Correct60% picked this

    It violated its own supposed religious ethics by

    Why this is right

    This nicely stays within our Support Window (the first sentence of the final paragraph). Kogawa is critiquing the professed ethics of the majority culture. Putting the word 'professed' in there is sort of like saying "his supposed concern for my well being". If we thought he genuinely was concerned, we wouldn't use that modifier. By saying, "his supposed concern", we're implying that "supposedly, he was concerned, but we don't think he really was." Similarly by saying the professed ethics of the majority culture, rather than just saying "the ethics", it's implying that this majority culture liked to talk a big game about being ethical, but yet they were simultaneously doing something very unethical to their Japanese-Canadian citizens. Another example: "He professes to be unbiased, but of course he sided with his girlfriend" ... this is a way to indicate some hypocrisy or insincerity. So critiquing the professed ethics is saying, "your actions don't match your rhetoric. You violated your own supposed ethics."

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  4. Out of Scope: thwarting transformation3% picked this

    It prohibited its citizens from participating in rites

    We don't have any text to support the idea that the majority culture tried to prohibit people from participating in rites of passage. This is just a Word Salad that is grabbing "rites of passage" from the 2nd paragraph, which is outside our Support Window for this question stem.

  5. Out of Scope7% picked this

    It demanded that loyalty to the government replace loyalty to

    Out of Scope: demanded loyalty to govt. We don't have any text to support the idea that the majority culture said, "loyalty to the government is more important than loyalty to family". Even if we pull in our outside knowledge of internment camps, families went there together. People didn't forsake their family to go to the internment camp. And it's not like cooperating with a government that is forcing you to relocate to an internment camp can even be thought of as an act of loyalty. It's just compliance.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free