Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT118 S4 Q10 Explanation

The enthusiastic acceptance of ascetic

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsFlaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

The enthusiastic acceptance of ascetic lifestyles evidenced in the surviving writings of monastic authors indicates that medieval societies were much less concerned are contemporary Western cultures.

What this question is testing

Flaw

Your task

Describe the reasoning error the argument actually commits.

Common trap

Answers that name a real logical flaw the argument doesn't actually make.

Winning move

Articulate the gap in the reasoning yourself, then match it to the choice that describes that gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
10.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds

Answer choices

  1. Not a Flaw2% picked this

    employs the imprecise term

    Answers that are asking for specific measurements or precise definitions are always wrong. Ascetic has a specific enough meaning; the fact that most of us don't know it doesn't make it imprecise.

  2. Correct80% picked this

    generalizes from a sample that is likely to

    Why this is right

    People that live cloistered lives in religious sanctuaries aren't exactly Joe Average, so using something we know about monastic folk (i.e. "They prayed eight times a day, and went to church seven days a week") wouldn't be something you'd automatically assume is true of most of their society.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Not Inappropriate13% picked this

    applies contemporary standards inappropriately to medieval

    The author's conclusion is comparing contemporary standards of money-lust vs. those of medieval societies. There's nothing wrong or inappropriate with making that comparison. The flaw was in thinking that we know what the money-lust standards of medieval standards are by applying the standards of medieval monks.

  4. No Opinions2% picked this

    inserts personal opinions into what purports to be a

    There are no personal opinions expressed. We are trying to factually assess which society was more concerned with financial gain. The only evidence isn't an opinion, it's the testimony of medieval monks.

  5. No Contradiction3% picked this

    advances premises that are

    This answer describes the famous flaw Internal Contradiction, which is almost always wrong. There's also only one premise, so it's impossible for there to be contradictory premises here.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free