Logical Reasoning

PT118 · S3 · Q24 The increasing complexity of scientific

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The increasing complexity of scientific inquiry has led to a proliferation of multiauthored technical articles.

Statements

Causal (led to)

increasingly complex ⇢ lots of mult-author scientific inquiry technical articles

Quantified-Most (usually / generally)

Most reports of trials are co-authored involving patients by docs from from several hospitals each hospital

Most physics papers are co-authored relying on systems by ppl from from several labs each lab

Evaluate

Was there any Overlapping Idea amongst these claims, that might allow us to synthesize them?

Maybe -- all three claims dealt with "multi-authored technical articles". But I'm not sure how we could synthesize any of those claims. It feels like the passage is insinuating that "increasing complexity" is explaining sentence 2 and sentence 3.

Those last two sentences feel like examples of "increasing complexity leading to more multi-authored stuff".

Goal

Maybe the answer will have something to do with the idea of "increasing complexity" meaning that we want to get docs from several hospitals in on the same report, or that we want to use subsystems developed at various labs.

Mostly, though, I would feel pretty helpless to guess where this is headed and would just err on the side of avoiding Strong/Specific language, unknown comparisons, or unmentioned concepts.

24.

If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must be true?

  1. Clinical trials involving patients from

    Too Strong: Never

    We were told that trials involving patients from several hospitals are usually coauthored by physicians from separate hospitals. We wouldn't be able to say with 100% certainty that they are never authored by physicians from only one hospital.

    3% picked this

  2. Correct

    Most reports of clinical trials

    Why this is right

    What an unusual correct answer for an Inference question. It just regurgitates one claim, the 2nd sentence. The 2nd sentence said that "reports of clinical trials involving patients from several hospitals usually are co-authored", so, yeah, "most of them have multiple authors".

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    65% picked this

  3. When a technical article has

    Too Strong: usually Reversal

    We have two examples (the 2nd and 3rd sentences) in which an article that stems from different institutions usually has multiple authors. 2nd - Reports from clinical trials of different institutions usually have multiple authors. 3rd - And physics papers about results from different institutions usually have multiple authors. But this answer reverses that and says that, "reports with multiple authors usually come from several different institutions". Saying that "American Presidents are usually right handed people" is very different from saying "right handed people are usually American Presidents". "When there's a surfing competition, the weather is usually pretty warm" is very different from "When the weather is pretty warm, there's usually a surfing competition". Saying "Most A's are B" isn't the same as "Most B's are A".

    15% picked this

  4. Physics papers authored by researchers

    Too Strong: usually Illegal Reversal

    We know that "reports involving subsystems from different labs, usually have authors from each lab". But this is saying, "papers with authors from each lab usually are reports involving subsystems". We can't reverse the order of a Most statement and know that it's still true. Most Senators are men ? Most men are Senators

    15% picked this

  5. Most technical articles are authored

    Too Strong: Most / Solely

    We don't have any information that would allow us to derive whether more than 50% of technical articles are [anything]. We were never told "most technical articles are X", or "technical articles are usually X", so we don't have anything resembling this type of claim.

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free