Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT117 S3 Q18 Explanation

Until 1985 all commercial airlines

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Until 1985 all commercial airlines completely replenished the cabin air in planes in flight once every 30 minutes. Since then the rate has been once every hour. The less frequently cabin air is replenished in a plane in flight, the higher the level of it is for airborne illnesses to be spread.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported Causal Speculation5% picked this

    In 1985 there was a loosening of regulations concerning cabin air in

    We don't know why the rate of replenishing changed. It might be because of regulatory changes, but that's just as supportable as any other hypothesis (f.e. the airlines wanted to save money)

  2. Less Provable than Correct Answer25% picked this

    People who fly today are more likely to contract airborne illnesses than were people who

    This is a very tempting answer, because it goes along with the gist of what we were told about air in the cabin, but it's not a must be true. There are more factors than just air replenishment that can affect likelihood of contracting an airborne illness. Has the average health of passengers changed? Do passengers wear masks more than they used to? Are passengers less likely to fly with germ-ridden children than before? If there weren't a rock-solid provable answer available, then we would certainly pick this.

  3. Too Strong: impossible1% picked this

    Low levels of carbon dioxide in cabin air make it impossible for airborne

    We know that lower levels of CO2 make it harder for airborne illness to spread, but we can't do this Relative vs. Absolute switch and say, when there's low CO2, there's zero risk of spreading airborne illness.

  4. Out of Scope5% picked this

    In 1980 the rate at which the cabin air was replenished in commercial airliners was sufficient to protect passengers from the

    Out of Scope: effects of CO2 buildup The passage never discusses "the effects of CO2 buildup". We know one effect of CO2 buildup (easier for airborne illnesses to spread), but there maybe others as well (foggy thinking, fatigue). We don't know if the pre-1985 replenishment rate suppressed CO2 buildup so much that passengers were protected from all of its possible effects. We wouldn't even say that pre-1985 passengers were protected from airborne illnesses; we would just say they were better-protected than in post-1985.

  5. Correct65% picked this

    In 1980 the level of carbon dioxide in the cabin air on a two-hour commercial airline flight was lower than it is

    Why this is right

    On a two hour flight in 1980, the air would be replenished at least 3 times 30 mins in, 60 mins in, 90 mins in On a two hour flight today, the air would be replenished 1 time 60 mins in We have a rule that says "the less frequently it's replenished, the higher the level of CO2 in the plane". So that means that a two hour flight today would have a higher level of CO2 than would have a two hour flight in 1980. (you could say it's also replenished at the 2 hour mark, when the flight is over, but that would still mean 4 replenishments for 1980 and 2 replenishments for today)

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free