Reading Comprehension

PT117 · S1 · P2 · Q14 Historiography

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In the field of historiography—the writing of history based on a critical examination of authentic primary information sources—one area that has recently attracted attention focuses on the responses of explorers and settlers to new landscapes in order to provide insights into the transformations the landscape itself has undergone as a result of settlement.

Topic

The importance of including Chinese settlers' perspectives and contributions when studying the history of how the Pacific Coast landscape was transformed by settlement.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Recent historiographers argue that to fully understand the transformation of the Pacific Coast's landscape, it's necessary to look beyond traditional written records from European American explorers and include the actions and contributions of Chinese settlers, whose innovative approaches to agriculture reshaped the region. ( - P2; - P4)

P1: Traditional Sources for Studying Pacific Coast History

Historians have usually relied on the detailed written reports from 19th-century European American explorers to study how explorers and settlers responded to the Pacific Coast landscape.

P2: Reevaluating What Counts as a Source

Recently, some scholars have pointed out that these traditional records ignore Asian settlers, mostly because there’s a lack of written documents from them. These historians suggest it's important to also look at other kinds of evidence—like settlers' actions—to get a fuller picture.

P3: Chinese Settlers’ Different Approach to the Land

The passage gives examples of how Chinese settlers saw agricultural opportunities in places others didn’t, using resources like swamps and wild mustard in innovative ways that differed from European settlers.

14.

Which one of the following, if true, would most help to strengthen the author's main claim in the last sentence of the passage?

  1. Market research of agribusinesses owned

    No Impact

    This seems to be a fact more about the present than about connecting the past to the present. We need to hear that the Chinese settlers did stuff that set this region up for irrigation / specialty crop success. This answer is just saying that presently the specialty crop market is having success, for descendants of these Chinese settlers. But the answer isn't telling us anything that makes the Chinese settlers sound like they did anything crucial.

    9% picked this

  2. Correct

    Nineteenth-century surveying records indicate that

    Why this is right

    The fact that the current specialty crop businesses (that connect back to the Chinese settlers) are on land that started out as swamp lands suggests that when Chinese settlers arrived, they turned that land from swamp land into specialty crop territory. We were told at the end of the 3rd paragraph that, where Europeans saw useless, untillable swamp, Chinese settlers saw fresh water, fertile soil, and the potential for bringing water via irrigation. So if we connect the dots, the Chinese settlers "interacted with that landscape" by bringing water in via irrigation and turning that land into useful, tillable soil for growing specialty crops. Hence, they did something crucial to turn this area into the top producer of many specialty crops, and so you can't fully understand why this area is now the top producer of many specialty crop without appreciating how these Chinese settlers interacted with that landscape.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    70% picked this

  3. Research by university agricultural science

    No Impact

    Nothing in this answer tells us anything that connects to the Chinese settlers, so it's not helping us to argue that they interacted with the landscape in some crucial manner that paved the way for irrigation / specialty crops.

    9% picked this

  4. A technological history tracing the

    Weak Impact

    Nothing in this answer tells us anything that connects to the Chinese settlers. The Chinese settlers did come to the Pacific Coast area in the 19th century, but we'd be adding a big speculative leap to attribute this answer to them simply because of that. European explorers also arrived in the 19th century.

    9% picked this

  5. Weather records compiled over the

    No Impact

    Nothing in this answer tells us anything that connects to the Chinese settlers, so it's not helping us to argue that they interacted with the landscape in some crucial manner that paved the way for irrigation / specialty crops.

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free