Reading Comprehension

PT117 · S1 · P2 · Q11 Historiography

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

In the field of historiography—the writing of history based on a critical examination of authentic primary information sources—one area that has recently attracted attention focuses on the responses of explorers and settlers to new landscapes in order to provide insights into the transformations the landscape itself has undergone as a result of settlement.

Topic

The importance of including Chinese settlers' perspectives and contributions when studying the history of how the Pacific Coast landscape was transformed by settlement.

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Recent historiographers argue that to fully understand the transformation of the Pacific Coast's landscape, it's necessary to look beyond traditional written records from European American explorers and include the actions and contributions of Chinese settlers, whose innovative approaches to agriculture reshaped the region. ( - P2; - P4)

P1: Traditional Sources for Studying Pacific Coast History

Historians have usually relied on the detailed written reports from 19th-century European American explorers to study how explorers and settlers responded to the Pacific Coast landscape.

P2: Reevaluating What Counts as a Source

Recently, some scholars have pointed out that these traditional records ignore Asian settlers, mostly because there’s a lack of written documents from them. These historians suggest it's important to also look at other kinds of evidence—like settlers' actions—to get a fuller picture.

P3: Chinese Settlers’ Different Approach to the Land

The passage gives examples of how Chinese settlers saw agricultural opportunities in places others didn’t, using resources like swamps and wild mustard in innovative ways that differed from European settlers.

11.

The author would most likely disagree with which one of the following statements?

  1. Examining the actions not only

    Supported

    This answer choice sounds a ton like the final sentence in the passage. That final sentence only talks about needing to appreciate the input of Chinese settlers. It doesn't mention that examining any other cultural group would be necessary. But our author definitely thinks that historiographers shouldn't confine themselves to a narrow record of experience. If historiographers only looked at Asian settlers, then they would ignore all the actions of the European American explorers. The author certainly isn't going to advocate that. She wants historiographers to take into account every group's influence in order to get a full understanding.

    4% picked this

  2. The significance of certain actions

    Supported Extreme Disagree Position

    This is very hard to disagree with because it's so softly worded ("may be"). In order to pick this answer, we'd have to support the idea that in the author's mind, "every group of historiographers will recognize the same set of actions as significant and the same set of actions as insignificant." If there is ever ANY action where one group would say "significant" and another group would say "not significant", then this answer is true. In addition to the fact that no person would ever disagree with a statement this mild, we have the context from the early part of the 2nd paragraph where it's saying, "in furthering this investigation, some historiographers have recently recognized the need to expand their definition of what a source is. The sources traditionally accepted as documenting the history have too often omitted the response of Asian settlers to this territory." It sounds like there's some disagreement among historiographers over whether the actions of the Asian settlers are significant.

    4% picked this

  3. Recognizing the actions of Asian

    Supported Extreme Disagree Position

    It's easy to support that the author thinks "recognizing the actions of Asian settlers adds to the writing of the history of Pacific Coast U.S." The 3rd paragraph starts with "as a case in point", which is signaling that the author thinks the story of the Asian settlers is an example of something you need to know to have a full understanding of Pacific Coast history. The final sentence of the passage also echoes this. We don't have any support sentence for the idea that "the actions of the Asian settlers does not complete the writing of the history", but it would be pretty extreme to disagree with that. Disagreeing with that would mean that you believe, "Now that we've recognized the actions of the Asian settlers, we are 100% done with writing the history of the Pacific U.S. It's complete."

    5% picked this

  4. By recognizing as evidence the

    Supported

    The first two sentences of the 2nd paragraph support this. "Some historiographers have recognized the need to expand their definition of a source; they maintain that we've traditionally omitted the response (actions) of Asian settlers to this territory".

    9% picked this

  5. Correct

    The expanded definition of a

    Why this is right

    This goes against the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph, where the author is agreeing with historiographers who have started to recognize the truth: a full study of a culture's historical relationship to its land cannot confine itself to a narrow record of experience, such as the actions of Asian settlers (which the beginning of the 2nd paragraph tells us is an expanded definition of a source). Nothing in that general language suggests that expanding our definition of a source is only relevant for certain types of cultures. The author seems to appreciate the underlying logic of studying the actions of settlers who may not have left any written record, but whose actions still deeply inform the history of the region. That would apply to any such situation; it's not contingent on the percentage of non-Europeans immigrants.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    77% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free