Reading Comprehension

PT116 · S4 · P4 · Q26 Wine Effects

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Most scientists who study the physiological effects of alcoholic beverages have assumed that wine, like beer or distilled spirits, is a drink whose only active ingredient is alcohol.

Topic

The unique physiological effects and potential health benefits of wine compared to other alcoholic beverages.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Most scientists have treated wine as no different from other alcoholic drinks and only studied its harmful effects, but recent studies suggest moderate wine consumption may have unique, beneficial effects on heart health, likely due to compounds found in grapes. (Most Valuable Sentence: End of paragraph 1/start of paragraph 2, where the author pivots—)

P1: The Prevailing Assumption

Most scientists just lump wine in with beer and spirits as if the only thing that matters is the alcohol content, and they've overlooked that wine has, for centuries, been thought to have unique health benefits.

P2: Recent Research Challenging the Assumption

A few researchers decided to study wine separately and looked at moderate wine drinking. They found that alcohol from wine enters the bloodstream more slowly than from spirits, and, even more strikingly, countries with more moderate wine consumption see lower rates of early heart disease. This isn’t just about red wine—white wine shows the same effect. The question is: what’s causing these positive health results?

P3: Theories and Findings on Wine’s Health Effects

New studies show wine drinkers have higher levels of certain helpful compounds, including those that break up blood clots and reduce the effects of bad fats. Researchers have also found that wine can decrease blood vessel wall thickness and reduce the stickiness of platelets—both things that lower the risk for heart disease. Interestingly, similar effects show up when people drink a lot of grape juice, suggesting that grapes themselves, not just the alcohol, might be responsible for these benefits.

26.

In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with doing which one of the following?

  1. advocating a particular method of

    Out of Scope: method of treatment

    It's hard to see what we would match up with "method of treatment". The author is saying, "Most alcohol researchers have not previously studied wine as distinct from other alcoholic beverages, but they should, since wine actually has some healthful effects, due to the grapes." We might say the author is advocating that alcohol researchers treat wine as distinct from other forms of alcoholic beverages, but that would still be too narrow to capture the main thrust of the passage. The main thrust is, "Check it out, y'all -- new research shows that wine is good for the heart, most likely because of chemical compounds from the grapes that are used."

    2% picked this

  2. criticizing popular opinion

    Out of Scope: popular opinion

    There isn't really any discussion of popular opinion, and the author's main thrust definitely isn't to criticize regular old people. The only mention of popular opinion is in the last sentence of the 1st paragraph, and the author is very much agreeing with that opinion.

    4% picked this

  3. Correct

    correcting a scientific misconception

    Why this is right

    The passage begins with two statements that sum up the scientific misconception: 1. wine's only active ingredient is alcohol 2. the effects of wine are probably the same as the effects from other forms of alcoholic beverages The passage then pivots away from that in disagreement ... these scientists have obscured the popular wisdom that wine has healthful effects. And then she presents new research that suggests that moderate wine consumption does some great things for the heart. She ends by suggesting that there are certain compounds in grapes that are playing an active role in breaking up clots, decreasing the walls of blood vessels, and making platelets less sticky.

    Skill tested: Primary Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    86% picked this

  4. questioning the relevance of newly

    Opposite

    This answer makes it sound like the author is undermining the new evidence about wine having healthful effects, but the author is doing the opposite. She's presenting this evidence as though she thinks it is very relevant.

    6% picked this

  5. countering a revolutionary hypothesis

    Out of Scope: revolutionary hypothesis

    The idea in the last paragraph that "one of the most important discoveries in modern medicine is the link between lipid processing and premature heart disease" could be considered a revolutionary finding. It's weird to call it a hypothesis, because it sounds like it's way stronger than a guess or theory at this point. Either way, the author is not trying to counter that discovery in any way. She only says, "We now know of a several other things that are linked to heart disease".

    3% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free