Reading Comprehension

PT116 · S4 · P4 · Q24 Wine Effects

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Most scientists who study the physiological effects of alcoholic beverages have assumed that wine, like beer or distilled spirits, is a drink whose only active ingredient is alcohol.

Topic

The unique physiological effects and potential health benefits of wine compared to other alcoholic beverages.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Most scientists have treated wine as no different from other alcoholic drinks and only studied its harmful effects, but recent studies suggest moderate wine consumption may have unique, beneficial effects on heart health, likely due to compounds found in grapes. (Most Valuable Sentence: End of paragraph 1/start of paragraph 2, where the author pivots—)

P1: The Prevailing Assumption

Most scientists just lump wine in with beer and spirits as if the only thing that matters is the alcohol content, and they've overlooked that wine has, for centuries, been thought to have unique health benefits.

P2: Recent Research Challenging the Assumption

A few researchers decided to study wine separately and looked at moderate wine drinking. They found that alcohol from wine enters the bloodstream more slowly than from spirits, and, even more strikingly, countries with more moderate wine consumption see lower rates of early heart disease. This isn’t just about red wine—white wine shows the same effect. The question is: what’s causing these positive health results?

P3: Theories and Findings on Wine’s Health Effects

New studies show wine drinkers have higher levels of certain helpful compounds, including those that break up blood clots and reduce the effects of bad fats. Researchers have also found that wine can decrease blood vessel wall thickness and reduce the stickiness of platelets—both things that lower the risk for heart disease. Interestingly, similar effects show up when people drink a lot of grape juice, suggesting that grapes themselves, not just the alcohol, might be responsible for these benefits.

24.

It can be inferred from the passage that the author would most likely agree with which one of the following statements?

  1. Scientists should not attempt to

    Too Strong: should not

    It's an extreme position to tell researchers not to study something. Furthermore, the author's first paragraph makes her seem mildly annoyed that researchers have previously conflated wine with other alcoholic beverages, and that they have studied only abusive intake of these drinks, rather than moderate intake. So she would probably support some more research being given to moderate intake of other alcoholic beverages.

    5% picked this

  2. The conclusion that alcohol affects

    Out of Scope: questioning finding

    The author says in the 2nd paragraph that "alcohol has been shown conclusively to have negative effects, for example affecting the body's processing of lipids". She isn't disputing this conclusive truth.

    26% picked this

  3. Correct

    Moderate consumption of wine made

    Why this is right

    This is supported by the author's main point, that "moderate wine consumption is healthy because chemicals from grapes are good for the heart in various ways." Since grape-chemicals are the Causal Difference-Maker that makes wine healthier than the other alcohols (beer / liquor), the author would likely assume that an alcohol not made from grapes (made from plums or apples) would not have the same heart-healthy effects. The last two sentences are our support for this answer, since they crystallize the author's causal explanation for why wine is healthier: "the healthful effects of moderate wine intake derive from the concentration of certain natural compounds found in grapes". When a passage identifies a Causal Difference-Maker (i.e. "Liz was able to get into Columbia, despite her poor grades, because of her great LSAT score), then Most Supported correct answers often take this "Flip the Causal Difference-Maker" type of form: (A) If Liz had scored poorly on the LSAT, she would have been unlikely to get into Columbia.

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    66% picked this

  4. Red wine consumption has a

    Unknown Comparison: greater effect

    The 2nd paragraph reveals that researchers at first thought that the benefits of wine were only from red wine, but "subsequent research has shown identical results whether the wine was write or red." So we have no support for saying that red is more healthy than white.

    1% picked this

  5. Beer and distilled spirits contain

    Unsupported: beneficial ingredients

    We only are told that wine has an active ingredients (chemical compounds from grapes) whose effects tend to be beneficial. We don't have any reason from this passage to suspect that beer and liquor have some active ingredient whose effects tend to be beneficial.

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free