Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT116 S4 P2 Q9 Explanation

Multicultural Education

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsNon-Author OpinionSociety

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Many educators in Canada and the United States advocate multicultural education as a means of achieving multicultural understanding. There are, however, a variety of proposals as to what multicultural education should consist of. The most modest of these proposals holds that schools and colleges should promote multicultural understanding by teaching about other the majority culture. These values are typically those of liberalism: democracy, tolerance, and equality of persons.

Critics of this first proposal have argued that genuine understanding of other cultures is impossible if the study of other cultures is refracted through the distorting lens of the majority culture’s perspective. Not all cultures share liberal values. Their value systems have arisen in often radically different social and historical circumstances, and one insists on approaching them solely from within the majority culture’s perspective.

In response to this objection, a second version of multicultural education has developed that differs from the first in holding that multicultural education ought to adopt a neutral stance with respect to the value differences among cultures. The values of one culture should not be standards by which others are judged; each and sociology. They are, that is, methods which derive from the Western scientific perspective and heritage.

Critics of this second form of multicultural education argue as follows: The Western scientific heritage is founded upon an epistemological system that prizes the objective over the subjective, the logical over the intuitive, and the empirically verifiable over the mystical. The methods of social-scientific examination of cultures are thus already value laden; the (often nonscientific) perspectives and methods of the cultures studied that real understanding can be achieved.

What this question is testing

Non-Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
9.

Critics who raise the objection discussed in the second paragraph would be most likely to agree with which

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong10% picked this

    The social and historical circumstances that give rise to a culture’s values cannot be understood by members of

    Too Strong: cannot be understood Word Salad The text was saying that "because of different social historical circumstances, Culture X has different values from ours, and it will be impossible to understand Culture X if we approach it using our values." The text was never talking about trying to understand the social and historical circumstances. This form of trap answer is like a tossed salad of words and phrases that appeared in the text, but it creates a new, unsupported meaning. These critics also weren't saying it's impossible to understand a culture with different values, they were saying it's impossible to understand a culture with different values if you use your culture's majority perspective. If you choose to study Culture X using Culture X's perspective, you might be able to understand.

  2. Correct58% picked this

    The historical and social circumstances of a culture can play an important role in the development

    Why this is right

    The last two sentences of the 2nd paragraph supports this, if we do a little allowable mind-reading and imagine the logical connection the author was probably making between two consecutive ideas: Not all cultures share liberal values. (after all) Their value systems have arisen in often radically different social and historical circumstances. Opinion questions vary a lot in terms of whether the correct answer is a fairly derivable implication of something that was said in the passage vs. whether the correct answer is sort of a weak, gist-y idea or a step away from what the passage has explicitly said, but a very conservative amount of "mind-reading" on our part. The test writers have acknowledged that we're allowed to do more "mind-reading" in RC than in LR. We'll always pick something provable over something not-provable, but if you don't find any answer that's provable, you should relax your standards and use your common sense more.

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Wrong Stipulation23% picked this

    It is impossible for one culture to successfully study another culture unless it does so from more

    Normally, the extreme word 'impossible' would be a huge red flag, but we know that these critics did use language that strong. They say it's impossible to successfully understand Culture X if we use our culture's standards. We should use X's standards instead. This answer is saying we should use more than one standard, which isn't supported by any text.

  4. Wrong Stipulation5% picked this

    Genuine understanding of another culture is impossible unless that culture shares the

    Normally, the extreme word 'impossible' would be a huge red flag, but we know that these critics did use language that strong. They say it's impossible to successfully understand Culture X if we use our culture's standards. We should use X's standards instead. This answer is saying that we can only understand cultures that share our values. But the critics aren't saying that. They're just saying you can only understand a culture using that culture's values. If it's possible for us to use another culture's values as we study it, rather than use our own values, then it's still possible to study cultures who don't share our same values.

  5. Out of Scope: Western science5% picked this

    The values of liberalism cannot be adequately understood if we approach them solely through the

    Nothing in this 2nd paragraph is talking about Western science at all. Nor does this paragraph say anything about adequately understanding liberalism. Liberalism isn't a culture; it's a value. And this paragraph is only about what it takes to adequately understand a culture.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free