Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT116 S3 Q9 Explanation

Most lecturers who are effective

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be True

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Most lecturers who are effective teachers are eccentric, but some noneccentric lecturers are very effective teachers. In addition, is a good communicator.

What this question is testing

Must be True

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
9.

Which one of the following statements follows logically from the

Answer choices

  1. Correct65% picked this

    Some good communicators are

    Why this is right

    The people in the first sentence are lecturers, effective teachers, and eccentric. We're told that every effective teacher is a good communicator. So the people in the first sentence are lecturers, effective teachers, good communicators, and eccentric. That proves that some people are both eccentric and good communicators. More formally, we combine these two Some eccentric are effect teach effect ? good teach comm. and get this inference, Some eccentric are good comm.

    Skill tested: Must be True · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Too Strong: all Illegal Reversal4% picked this

    All good communicators are effective

    We can't say anything about all good communicators, because we were never told anything about that all good communicators. We know that some good communicators are effective teachers. The last sentence says this: effective teacher ? good comm. and this answer illegally reverses that: good comm ? effective teacher

  3. Out of Scope: not effective10% picked this

    Some lecturers who are not effective teachers are

    We only heard about teachers who are effective, so we have no information to support any inference about teachers are not effective.

  4. Too Strong: most Unknown Most Group16% picked this

    Most lecturers who are good communicators

    This answer talks about most [people who are lecturers and good communicators]. We never got a most fact about that group, so we can't make a most inference about that group. We only got a most fact about the group of [people who are lecturers and effective teachers]. People might be tempted to think, "Can't I just swap out effective with good communicator?" Anywhere we see "effective" we can add "good communicator", but we can't replace it and still be talking about the same group of people. Consider this example: "Most adults who are NFL players are paid over $1 million / year" "Every NFL player is a man." Could we just swap out "NFL player" for "man" and say, "Most adults who are men are paid over $1 million / year"? Of course not. We know that most adult males don't get paid that much. By changing from "most adults who are NFL players" to "most adults who are men" we went from talking about over 50% of a group of about 1000 people (NFL players) to talking about over 50% of a group of about 2 billion people (adult males).

  5. Out of Scope: not good communicator5% picked this

    Some noneccentric lecturers are effective teachers but are not

    We only received information about people who are good communicators, so we have no information to support any inference about people who are not good communicators.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free