Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT116 S2 Q6 Explanation

Therapists who treat violent criminals

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Therapists who treat violent criminals cannot both respect their clients’ right to confidentiality and be sincerely concerned for the welfare of victims of future violent crimes. Reporting a client’s unreported crimes violates the client’s trust, but out of prison, free to commit more crimes.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
6.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens

Answer choices

  1. No Impact13% picked this

    Most therapists who treat violent criminals are assigned this task by

    The backstory behind why therapists would end up working with a violent criminal is irrelevant to our assessment of whether it's possible to keep the client's confessions a secret while still being duly concerned for the welfare of future victims.

  2. Irrelevant Distinction: in/out of prison4% picked this

    Criminals are no more likely to receive therapy in prison than they are

    A comparison between how common it is for criminals in prison vs. out of prison to receive therapy is irrelevant to our assessment of whether it's possible to keep the client's confessions a secret while still being duly concerned for the welfare of future victims.

  3. Out of Scope: victims' confidentiality2% picked this

    Victims of future violent crimes also have a right to confidentiality should

    This discussion is about whether or not it's possible for a therapist to keep a violent criminal's confessions a secret while still being duly concerned for the welfare of future victims Whether or not future victims are also entitled to confidentiality in therapy has nothing to do with that discussion. This answer also says tells us something that common sense would already tell us (naturally, they would have a right to confidentiality -- why wouldn't a victim of a violent crime have a right to confidentiality in therapy?), so it isn't a new, impactful idea like what we're looking for.

  4. Out of Scope: compensation6% picked this

    The right of victims of violent crimes to compensation is as important as the right of criminals

    This discussion is about whether or not it's possible for a therapist to keep a violent criminal's confessions a secret while still being duly concerned for the welfare of future victims Whether or not victims of violent crimes are entitled to monetary compensation has nothing to do with that discussion.

  5. Correct75% picked this

    A therapist who has gained a violent criminal’s trust can persuade that criminal not to

    Why this is right

    This gives us a potential way to argue that it's possible for a therapist to keep a violent criminal's confessions a secret while still being duly concerned for the welfare of future victims A therapist might keep the client's unreported crimes a secret, thereby maintaining confidentiality. But the therapist could simultaneously be showing sincere concern for the potential of future victims by persuading their client not to commit any future crimes. If the client isn't dangerous going forward, then keeping their checkered past a secret isn't endangering people. Thus, it is possible for a therapist to balance respect for confidentiality and concern for potential future victims.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free