Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT116 S2 Q4 Explanation

A study claims that the average

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMost Supported

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

A study claims that the average temperature on Earth has permanently increased, because the average temperature each year for the last five years has been higher than any previous yearly average on record. However, periods of up to ten years of average temperatures that have consistently the random fluctuations in temperature that are always occurring.

What this question is testing

Most Supported

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: all2% picked this

    All large increases in average temperature on record have occurred in

    We have no way from this paragraph to prove that every single time there has been a large increase in average temp, it's been for a ten year period.

  2. Correct90% picked this

    Five successive years of increasing annual average temperature does not always signify a permanent

    Why this is right

    This is provable from our info. "X is not always Y" has a very low burden of proof: prove that there's at least one example of X that was not Y. Do we have at least one example of five straight years of increasing temps that did not signify a permanent increase in temperature? Sure. Apparently there have even been periods of ten years that were just part of the random fluctuation. Random fluctuation = not a permanent increase

    Skill tested: Most Supported · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Too Strong: can be expected3% picked this

    Record high temperatures can be expected on Earth for another

    Just because we've seen temps rise for 5 years, and because there have been some 10 year rises in temp, we can't assume that we are currently in one of those 10 year periods. The author cited "periods of up to 10 years", so many of these random fluctuations lasted less than 10 years.

  4. Too Strong: typically4% picked this

    Random fluctuations in Earth’s average temperature typically last less than

    We don't have enough information about random fluctuations to guess whether more than 50% of them are less than ten years. First of all, the author used language "up to ten years", which includes ten years. So maybe the majority of those "up to ten" were actually ten! More importantly, our author was only discussing the type of random fluctuation in which you get multiple consecutive years (up to 10) of rising temperatures. That might not be the only type of random fluctuation. It might be even more common for there to be 20 year cooling cycles that happen as part of the random fluctuations. (I will say, it seems crazy to be using period/cycle in the same sentence as random. It would be tempting to think of random has meaning every year is its own "cycle", since it's all random. But in the context they're making it seem like "trends" coexist within "randomness")

  5. Too Strong: never / except2% picked this

    The average temperature on Earth never increases except in cases of

    We don't have enough info to say that random temperature fluctuations are the only cause ever of temperature increases.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free