Logical Reasoning

PT116 · S2 · Q12 Essayist: People once believed that Earth

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Essayist: People once believed that Earth was at the center of the universe, and that, therefore, Earth and its inhabitants were important.

Conclusion

Earth and its inhabitants are not important

Evidence

People used to think we were important because they thought Earth was at the center of the universe, but now we realize that Earth is just a random planet in a random solar system in a random galaxy.

Evaluation

Given this evidence, how would we still argue that Earth and its peeps are important?

Well ... maybe we're in a random spot of the universe, but we're one of the only intelligent, self-aware species? Maybe we're important because we're the only planet with coal? Who knows.

Goal

Conversationally, we're thinking, Formally, this author committed the Unproven vs. Proven False flaw, because she's thinking

12.

A flaw in the essayist's argument is that the argument

  1. presumes, without providing justification, that

    Opposite Logic

    The conditional word "only" shows that this would look like Good reason to believe ? True statement This is somewhat close to the author's logic about the statement "Earth is important", but it's opposite logic. Our author was saying, "Since their reason for believing Earth is important was a bad one, it must be false to say that Earth is important." So her logic looks like, Not good reason to believe ? Not true statement

    11% picked this

  2. Correct

    neglects to consider that a

    Why this is right

    The statement "Earth and its peeps are important" was believed for a questionable reason ("Earth is at the center of the universe!"), but it may still be a true statement.

    Skill tested: Flaw · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    78% picked this

  3. fails to consider that there

    Not an Objection

    Does it hurt the author's argument if we say "there's no way to disbelieve a true statement"? Not really. The only statement our author considered true was that "Earth is not at the center of the universe". Would she think that that statement is impossible to disbelieve? No, because she knows that humans used to believe otherwise. So it's fair to say that our author thinks there can be reason to disbelieve a true statement. When we say "there can be no reason to disbelieve a true statement", that would clash with her worldview, but it would have nothing to do with the logic of her argument. Also, her worldview is much more sensible. It's not a very persuasive objection for us to claim "it's impossible to doubt a true statement". An apt, nearby description that would accurately describe this argument is that "the author fails to consider that there can be bad reasons for believing a true statement". That's what correct choice (B) is essentially saying.

    2% picked this

  4. overlooks the fact that people’s

    Not an Objection

    It doesn't hurt the author to suggest that perception of importance changes. She would happily agree to that idea. After all, humans used to perceive Earthlings as important, and now our author does not perceive us as important. So she would clearly accept the possibility that perception of importance can change from century to century.

    7% picked this

  5. neglects the fact that people’s

    Out of Scope: culture

    Culture really had nothing to do with the conversation. We certainly couldn't weaken the author's argument by pointing out that different cultures perceive their importance differently. She is making an argument about whether or not Earthlings are important, not about how cultures perceive their own importance. And our author probably agrees that her culture perceives Earthlings as insignificant in the cosmic context, whereas earlier cultures perceived Earthlings as significant.

    2% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free