Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Medium

PT116 S1 P3 Q21 Explanation

Literary Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsInferenceHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Reader-response theory, a type of literary theory that arose in reaction to formalist literary criticism, has endeavored to shift the emphasis in the interpretation of literature from the text itself to the contributions of readers to the meaning of a text. According to literary critics who endorse reader-response theory, the literary text theory has a monopoly on divining meaning from a text, the formalists’ view appears unnecessarily narrow.

The proponents of formalism argue that their approach is firmly grounded in rational, objective principles, while reader-response theory lacks standards and verges on absolute subjectivity. After all, these proponents argue, no author can create a work that is packed with countless meanings. The meaning of a work of literature, the formalists would and make use of the rich stock of meanings created in encounters between texts and readers.

Emphasizing the varied presuppositions and perceptions that readers bring to the interpretations of a text can uncover hitherto unnoticed dimensions of the text. In fact, many important works have received varying interpretations throughout their existence, suggesting that reader-based interpretations similar to those described by reader-response theory had been operating long before the lively forms of discourse that can continue to support new interpretations long after their original composition.

What this question is testing

Inference

Your task

Find what must be true based on what the passage or stimulus states.

Common trap

Answers that are plausible or likely but not actually guaranteed by the text.

Winning move

Keep only the choice the statements fully support — eliminate anything that requires an extra assumption.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

Which one of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the information

Answer choices

  1. Correct76% picked this

    Formalists believe that responsible critics who focus on the text alone will tend to find the same or similar

    Why this is right

    Answer A is correct.

    Skill tested: Inference · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Trap4% picked this

    Critical approaches similar to those described by formalism had been used to interpret texts long before the theory

  3. Trap16% picked this

    Formalists would not find any meaning in a text whose author did not intend it to have

  4. Trap3% picked this

    A literary work from the past can rarely be read properly using reader-response theory when the subtleties of the work’s

  5. Trap1% picked this

    Formalism is much older and has more adherents than

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free