Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Easy

PT116 S1 P3 Q16 Explanation

Literary Theory

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsAuthor OpinionHumanities

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

Reader-response theory, a type of literary theory that arose in reaction to formalist literary criticism, has endeavored to shift the emphasis in the interpretation of literature from the text itself to the contributions of readers to the meaning of a text. According to literary critics who endorse reader-response theory, the literary text theory has a monopoly on divining meaning from a text, the formalists’ view appears unnecessarily narrow.

The proponents of formalism argue that their approach is firmly grounded in rational, objective principles, while reader-response theory lacks standards and verges on absolute subjectivity. After all, these proponents argue, no author can create a work that is packed with countless meanings. The meaning of a work of literature, the formalists would and make use of the rich stock of meanings created in encounters between texts and readers.

Emphasizing the varied presuppositions and perceptions that readers bring to the interpretations of a text can uncover hitherto unnoticed dimensions of the text. In fact, many important works have received varying interpretations throughout their existence, suggesting that reader-based interpretations similar to those described by reader-response theory had been operating long before the lively forms of discourse that can continue to support new interpretations long after their original composition.

What this question is testing

Author Opinion

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
16.

With which one of the following statements would the author of the passage be most

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong: any / inevitable2% picked this

    Any literary theory should be seen ultimately as limiting, since contradictory interpretations of

    We can't find a way to support this strongly worded claim that all literary theories inevitably yield contradictions.

  2. Correct90% picked this

    A purpose of a literary theory is to broaden and enhance the understanding that can be

    Why this is right

    This reflects the author's stance. She thinks reader-response theory sometimes goes too far, but overall she thinks that this theory has value, because it can "uncover hitherto unnoticed dimensions of the text". She says: while in some cases [reader response goes too far], unfairly burdening literature of the past with contemporary ideologies, legitimate additional insights and understandings continue to emerge .... There, she is complimenting reader response theory because it allows legitimate additional insights and understanding to emerge. So it's reasonable to think she would agree that "one purpose of a literary theory (one source of value) is when it can broaden and enhance the understanding that can be gained from a work". She talks about broadening the understanding in the final sentence: reader-response theory legitimizes a wide range of perspectives on these works

    Skill tested: Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Different View2% picked this

    A literary theory should provide valid and strictly objective methods for

    This is isn't the author's view. This is more like how the formalists would think. They think there's "one right answer" when it comes to the meaning of the text, so they would be down with valid and objective methods for interpreting texts.

  4. Different View3% picked this

    The purpose of a literary theory is to make clear the intended meaning of the

    This is isn't the author's view. This is how the formalists think. They think there's "one right answer" when it comes to the meaning of the text, the author's intended meaning. They think that a literary theory should solve the correct answer of each text. The author thinks that's unnecessarily narrow and likes how reader-response validates different perspectives on the text.

  5. Too Strong: avoid using theories3% picked this

    Since no literary theory has a monopoly on meaning, a reader should avoid using theories

    While the opening clause is a verbatim quote of the passage (red flag, red flag), the main clause can't be supported. The author's stance isn't that "we shouldn't use any theories". She thinks that formalists are a little too rigid with their views, but she seems to agree with them on some points. She thinks reader-response sometimes gets silly, but often adds real value.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free