Reading Comprehension

PT116 · S1 · P1 · Q4 Oil Drilling Contamination

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells.

Topic

The environmental impact of oil well drilling on groundwater and the ongoing challenges in regulating and preventing contamination.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

Efforts to prevent groundwater contamination from oil drilling have often been reactive rather than proactive, and recent disasters show that regulatory and technological solutions are still limited by incomplete scientific knowledge. *The most valuable sentence appears at the end of the first paragraph:*

P1: Overview of the Regulatory Lag

Scientific understanding and regulation of environmental impacts from oil drilling often come only after problems are noticed—especially with groundwater contamination.

P2: Early Focus of Regulation and Emerging Problems

At first, regulations protected oil from being contaminated by water, but no one thought about protecting groundwater from oil until people started finding oil in their drinking water wells.

P3: How Contamination Happens and Industry Responses

Drilling can connect different underground layers, letting oil or salty water leak into groundwater; attempts to seal off fresh water have evolved from using hollow trees to modern metal casings with cement.

The author uses the phrase "the hazards of insufficient knowledge" (near the beginning of the last paragraph) primarily in order to refer to the risks resulting from

a lack of understanding regarding
Out of Scope
Out of Scope: threat to human health Nothing in that final stretch of "insufficient knowledge" mentioned a lack of understanding what health dangers contamination posed for humans.
9% picked this
Correct
a failure to comprehend the
Why this is right
Rather than zooming in on any one part of our insufficient knowledge, this answer is just summing up the overall situation. We're drilling in complex geologic systems, and we're not sure what's going to happen. Fluids might flow up the well and corrode the casing or dissolve the cement. The bacteria in groundwater might mess up our pipes. The vibrations from traffic. The changing chemistry of the groundwater. The subsurface geology. It's a complex world down there that we don't know enough about, and it's hazardous when we mess up, as we hear about in relation to a major disaster off the west coast of North America.
Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
56% picked this
poorly tested methods for verifying
Out of Scope: safety testing methods
This answer is saying that we have methods for verifying the safety of our new drilling technologies, but those methods of verifying safety have been poorly tested. That doesn't match anything in the final paragraph. We're never talking about our means of testing for safety. We're talking about our confusion in not knowing what's going to happen in the long term based on corrosion, bacteria, vibrations, chemistry, geology.
16% picked this
an inadequate appreciation for the
Out of Scope: enforcing regulations
Nothing in the final paragraph is talking about enforcing environmental regulations until the very final sentence, but that sentence has nothing to do with what our insufficient knowledge is all about. Because of our insufficient knowledge of XYZ, we have had major ecological disasters, and that has encouraged a desire for refined regulations that we would then try to enforce. But the passage was never saying we have insufficient knowledge of enforcing regulations.
1% picked this
a rudimentary understanding of the
Out of Scope
Out of Scope: materials used in casings Too Strong: rudimentary This answer is saying that we only barely understand the materials used in these pipe casings. We have but a "rudimentary" understanding of concrete? The final paragraph isn't saying we don't understand the materials. It's just saying we're not sure how underground pipe-life will interact with these materials. We're not sure how fluids / vibrations / bacteria etc. will affect the structural integrity of the casings. That doesn't mean we have a rudimentary (primitive, simple) grasp of concrete. It just means we don't have a firm grasp on how concrete will perform in a very complex setting.
18% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free