Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT116 S1 P1 Q4 Explanation

Oil Drilling Contamination

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMeaning in ContextScience

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

The accumulation of scientific knowledge regarding the environmental impact of oil well drilling in North America has tended to lag behind the actual drilling of oil wells. Most attempts to regulate the industry have relied on hindsight: the need for regulation becomes apparent only after undesirable events occur. The problems associated with earth that supplies wells and springs—provide a case in point.

When commercial drilling for oil began in North America in the mid-nineteenth century, regulations reflected the industry’s concern for the purity of the wells’ oil. In 1893, for example, regulations were enacted specifying well construction requirements to protect oil and gas reserves from contamination by fresh water. Thousands of wells were drilled many drinking-water wells near the oil well sites began to produce unpotable, oil-contaminated water.

The reason for this contamination was that groundwater is usually found in porous and permeable geologic formations near the earth’s surface, whereas petroleum and unpotable saline water reservoirs are generally found in similar formations but at greater depths. Drilling a well creates a conduit connecting all the formations that it has penetrated. the groundwater formations; now, however, large metal pipe casings, set in place with cement, are used.

Regulations currently govern the kinds of casing and cement that can be used in these practices; however, “the hazards of insufficient knowledge” persist. For example, the long-term stability of this way of protecting groundwater is unknown. The protective barrier may fail due to corrosion of the casing by certain fluids flowing up contamination also occurred, prompting international concern over oil exploration and initiating further attempts to refine regulations.

What this question is testing

Meaning in Context

Your task

Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.

Common trap

Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.

Winning move

Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
4.

The author uses the phrase “the hazards of insufficient knowledge” (fourth paragraph) primarily in order to refer to

Answer choices

  1. Out of Scope9% picked this

    a lack of understanding regarding the dangers to human health posed

    Out of Scope: threat to human health Nothing in that final stretch of "insufficient knowledge" mentioned a lack of understanding what health dangers contamination posed for humans.

  2. Correct55% picked this

    a failure to comprehend the possible consequences of drilling in complex

    Why this is right

    Rather than zooming in on any one part of our insufficient knowledge, this answer is just summing up the overall situation. We're drilling in complex geologic systems, and we're not sure what's going to happen. Fluids might flow up the well and corrode the casing or dissolve the cement. The bacteria in groundwater might mess up our pipes. The vibrations from traffic. The changing chemistry of the groundwater. The subsurface geology. It's a complex world down there that we don't know enough about, and it's hazardous when we mess up, as we hear about in relation to a major disaster off the west coast of North America.

    Skill tested: Meaning in Context · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Out of Scope: safety testing methods16% picked this

    poorly tested methods for verifying the safety of newly

    This answer is saying that we have methods for verifying the safety of our new drilling technologies, but those methods of verifying safety have been poorly tested. That doesn't match anything in the final paragraph. We're never talking about our means of testing for safety. We're talking about our confusion in not knowing what's going to happen in the long term based on corrosion, bacteria, vibrations, chemistry, geology.

  4. Out of Scope: enforcing regulations1% picked this

    an inadequate appreciation for the difficulties of enacting and enforcing

    Nothing in the final paragraph is talking about enforcing environmental regulations until the very final sentence, but that sentence has nothing to do with what our insufficient knowledge is all about. Because of our insufficient knowledge of XYZ, we have had major ecological disasters, and that has encouraged a desire for refined regulations that we would then try to enforce. But the passage was never saying we have insufficient knowledge of enforcing regulations.

  5. Out of Scope19% picked this

    a rudimentary understanding of the materials used in manufacturing metal

    Out of Scope: materials used in casings Too Strong: rudimentary This answer is saying that we only barely understand the materials used in these pipe casings. We have but a "rudimentary" understanding of concrete? The final paragraph isn't saying we don't understand the materials. It's just saying we're not sure how underground pipe-life will interact with these materials. We're not sure how fluids / vibrations / bacteria etc. will affect the structural integrity of the casings. That doesn't mean we have a rudimentary (primitive, simple) grasp of concrete. It just means we don't have a firm grasp on how concrete will perform in a very complex setting.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free