Reading Comprehension

PT115 · S3 · P4 · Q28 Canadian Copyrights and Digitialization

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Start practicing free

The following passage was written in the mid-1990s.

Topic

The challenges posed by Internet digitalization to Canadian copyright law in the 1990s

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The rise of digitalization via the Internet has created serious challenges for Canadian copyright law, which isn’t well equipped to handle digital copies and distribution, leading to ongoing conflicts between information-sharing ideals and content creators' rights. **The Most Valuable Sentence:** The last part of the last paragraph sums it up best:

P1: Introduction – The Information Utopia vs. Reality

Many Internet users dreamed of free access to information, but now those dreams are colliding with the reality that copyrighted books, films, and music are being distributed without compensation to rights holders, creating conflict.

P2: Legal Ambiguity – Copyright Law Lags Behind Technology

Canadian copyright law hasn’t kept up with digital advances, especially "digitalization"—which allows limitless, rapid copying and global distribution. Since current law only bans unauthorized "material reproduction," it's unclear if digital copies even count, so there’s a gray area about whether it's illegal.

P3: Proposed Solution and Its Complications

Some want to explicitly ban unauthorized digital copying, but criminalizing digitalization raises difficult questions: Should everyone who receives or makes a copy be a criminal? How would you enforce these laws with so many users worldwide? Also, academic exemptions further muddy the waters. Even with legal updates, experts doubt the underlying conflict—Internet users vs. publishers—can be resolved easily.

28.

Which one of the following views can most reasonably be attributed to the experts cited in the first sentence of the third paragraph?

  1. Correct

    Unauthorized digitalization of a copyrighted

    Why this is right

    This answer is hard to pick on a first pass, because although part of it is what we're looking for (unauthorized digitalization should be a crime), the other part comes out of nowhere (except if it's for private study or research). The latter half of the 3rd paragraph explains that: current copyright law allows generous exemptions for those engaged in private study or research. How would we know whether these experts think the same exemptions should be applied to digitalizing copyrighted works? Well, it's captured by the feel of the first sentence of the 3rd paragraph, in which it sounds like these experts are saying, "Hey, just add unauthorized digitalization to list of things proscribed by current law." Current law proscribes unauthorized copies, if they are not involved in private study or research. So adding unauthorized digitalization to the current list would mean, "unauthorized digitalization is forbidden, if it's not part of private study or research."

    Skill tested: Non-Author Opinion · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    54% picked this

  2. Unauthorized digitalization of a copyrighted

    Too Strong

    This, of course, comes down to the same distinction we just analyzed with (A). It's not directly stated whether these experts think that the typical exemptions for private study or research should or should not apply. But since they are saying we "simply" add unauthorized digitalization to the list of currently proscribed activities, and since unauthorized duplication for the purposes of private study or research is not currently proscribed, it sounds like these experts would be assuming the same exemptions apply to digitalization.

    17% picked this

  3. Making a copy of a

    Opposite

    These experts propose adding unauthorized digitalization to the list of activities currently proscribed (i.e. forbidden) under current law. So they think unauthorized digitalization should be considered a crime.

    2% picked this

  4. Making a copy of a

    Too Specific Unknown Comparison

    All we know about these experts is that they think unauthorized digitalization should be treated essentially the same way we treat other unauthorized forms of copying. They don't qualify that statement and talk about different degrees of punishment.

    3% picked this

  5. Making a copy of a

    Too Specific Unknown Comparison

    All we know about these experts is that they think unauthorized digitalization should be treated essentially the same way we treat other unauthorized forms of copying. They don't qualify that statement and talk about different degrees of punishment.

    24% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill
LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free