With the approach of the twentieth century, the classical wave theory of radiation—a widely accepted theory in physics—began to encounter obstacles. This theory held that all electromagnetic radiation—the entire spectrum from gamma and X rays to radio frequencies, including heat and light—exists in the form of waves. One fundamental assumption of wave smoothly to any setting—and that any conceivable energy value could thus occur in nature.
The major challenge to wave theory was the behavior of thermal radiation, the radiation emitted by an object due to the object’s temperature, commonly called “blackbody” radiation because experiments aimed at measuring it require objects, such as black velvet or soot, with little or no reflective capability. Physicists can monitor the radiation they found almost none, a result that became known among wave theorists as the “ultraviolet catastrophe.”
Max Planck, a classical physicist who had made important contributions to wave theory, developed a hypothesis about atomic processes taking place in a blackbody object that broke with wave theory and accounted for the observed patterns of blackbody radiation. Planck discarded the assumption of radiation’s smooth energy continuum and took the then at first quite critical of Planck’s hypothesis, in part because he presented it without physical explanation.
Soon thereafter, however, Albert Einstein and other physicists provided theoretical justification for Planck’s hypothesis. They found that upon being hit with part of the radiation spectrum, metal surfaces give off energy at values that are discontinuous. Further, they noted a threshold along the spectrum beyond which no energy is emitted by the a catastrophe generated a new vision in physics that led to theories still in place today.
What this question is testing
Your task
Pin down exactly what the question asks about the passage — a detail, the author's view, the structure, or the main point — before looking at the choices.
Common trap
Answers that restate a true detail from the passage but don't answer the specific question being asked.
Winning move
Anticipate the answer in your own words from the passage, then find the choice that matches that prediction.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.