Reading Comprehension

PT115 · S1 · P3 · Q20 Haraway’s Primate Visions

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Donna Haraway’s Primate Visions is the most ambitious book on the history of science yet written from a feminist perspective, embracing not only the scientific construction of gender but also the interplay of race, class, and colonial and postcolonial culture with the “Western” construction of the very concept of nature itself.

Topic

Donna Haraway’s reimagining of the history of science, gender, and nature through primatology and feminist theory.

Framework

Highlight Noteworthy + Challenge Position

Main Point

Haraway’s Primate Visions radically rethinks the history of science by rejecting traditional, unified narratives and challenging the separation between scientist and subject as well as between science and culture; instead, she argues for a fragmented, multiperspective view that includes cultural forces and nonhuman actors as shapers of knowledge. ()

P1: Introducing Haraway’s Book and its Ambition

Haraway’s Primate Visions is described as a bold, feminist history of science that doesn’t just look at gender, but also brings in race, class, and culture to show how Western views of nature have been shaped. Primatology is chosen as her entry point, since our closeness to primates invites scientists to project human societal beliefs onto them.

P2: Haraway’s Theoretical Challenge to Science

Haraway directly questions the usual idea that scientists are completely separate from the subjects they study. She says seeing nature as something apart from and controlled by people is outdated and problematic. Instead, she thinks both human and nonhuman agents (like primates themselves) help build what we know—and that instead of a single truth, we have many, interconnected partial truths.

P3: Haraway’s Unconventional Writing and Historical Approach

This different way of thinking is matched by her nonlinear, fragmented writing style. Rather than tying everything into one grand narrative about primatology, Haraway keeps separate voices distinct, refusing to force them into a "master story." This patchwork method is rare among historians of science.

20.

In the second sentence of the last paragraph, the author uses the term "rhetoric" most probably in order to do which one of the following?

  1. underscore the importance of clear

    Dictionary Trap

    The scholastic subject of Rhetoric is a class in "clear and effective writing" (or speaking), so this answer is just trying to get people to pick whatever definition they have in their heads of the word rhetoric. The beginning of the last paragraph is discussing the rarity of finding broad cultural issues within scientific analysis. It has nothing to do with "clear and effective writing".

    2% picked this

  2. highlight the need for historians

    Unrelated to Goal

    This answer is also leaning on the definition of "rhetoric" as "effective, persuasive arguments". Our author never stressed that historians need to study modes of language. The actual contextual usage of rhetoric was purely about the notion of incorporating broad cultural issues into scientific analysis.

    1% picked this

  3. Correct

    emphasize the fact that historians

    Why this is right

    Like most correct answers on Local Purpose, this reinforces language from the preceding sentence. Haraway was innovative because she finally did the thing that historians only talked about doing for decades -- uniting scientific analysis with broader social/cultural issues. The use of "rhetoric" in the 2nd sentence of that last paragraph is almost a sarcastic eyeroll ... "Despite years of rhetoric about fiscal discipline, the conservative party granted a huge tax break to the rich even though the economy was in a huge expansion that had not yet slowed down." Despite talking about incorporating broad cultural issues for decades, historians before Haraway haven't been able to do it (that dichotomy has proven difficult to set aside).

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    54% picked this

  4. criticize the excessive concern for

    Unrelated to Goal Opposite, if anything

    Just like (B), this answer leans on the definition of "rhetoric" as "the study of arguments". Our author never criticized historians for being excessively concerned with form. The actual contextual usage of rhetoric was purely about the notion of incorporating broad cultural issues into scientific analysis. The decades of rhetoric were concerned about content! They were saying stuff like, "We should stop excluding external content, such as social issues / structures / beliefs, from our scientific analysis".

    30% picked this

  5. characterize the writing style and

    Not Describing Haraway

    The use of rhetoric is describing historians of science, not Haraway. It's saying, unlike Haraway, they have only provided rhetoric when it comes to incorporating broad cultural issues into scientific analysis.

    13% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free