Reading Comprehension

PT114 · S3 · P4 · Q27 Medical Ethics Training

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

One of the greatest challenges facing medical students today, apart from absorbing volumes of technical information and learning habits of scientific thought, is that of remaining empathetic to the needs of patients in the face of all this rigorous training.

Topic

How medical students can become more empathetic and better prepared for real ethical dilemmas through studying narrative literature as part of their ethics training.

Framework

Problem / Solution

Main Point

The author argues that while traditional ethics training in medical schools is too theoretical to foster empathy and real-world ethical reasoning, incorporating narrative literature can help students develop the flexible moral imagination they need to face modern ethical dilemmas as compassionate doctors. Most Valuable Sentence: (end of P1) and (end of final paragraph)

P1: The Problem—Empathy Lost in Medical Training

Medical students risk losing touch with patients' personal needs and the ethical side of being a doctor because their training is so focused on technical and scientific aspects. The author suggests that immersing students solely in science is not enough, and proposes that studying narrative literature could be one way to help students stay empathetic.

P2: Issues with Current Ethics Education

Currently, med schools teach ethics in a very philosophical, abstract way, which doesn't really help students deal with real-world situations where ethical dilemmas are messy and complicated. The author believes that ethics courses that use narrative literature, rather than just theory, are more helpful, because literature exposes readers to a diverse range of human experiences and perspectives.

P3: Why Narrative Literature Works

Reading stories helps students develop "flexible ethical thinking." By engaging with characters' moral dilemmas from various viewpoints, readers stretch their moral imagination and are forced to consider perspectives that differ from their own—super helpful skills for doctors facing real-life patient situations.

27.

The author's attitude regarding the traditional method of teaching ethics in medical school can most accurately be described as

unqualified disapproval of the method
Too Strong
"Qualified disapproval" would be okay. That means "I basically disapprove, although I should qualify that it does provide conceptual clarity that can be valuable." Unqualified disapproval means "there is nothing I like here".
5% picked this
reserved judgment regarding the method
Too Neutral
The author isn't reserving judgment. She definitely thinks that traditional ethics "contribute little to the understanding that med students will face as physicians."
10% picked this
partial disapproval of the method
Too Neutral
The author isn't clinically indifferent toward the effects. She definitely thinks that traditional ethics "contribute little to the understanding that med students will face as physicians." The final sentence of the passage says that narrative-based ethics training "can give us something that is lacking in the traditional philosophical study of ethics". She sees it as a "corrective" to what might otherwise be inflexible application of moral principles.
9% picked this
partial approval of the method
Contradicted: all of its effects
The author says that a traditional ethics course "can provide a valuable conceptual clarity", so she's approving of at least one of its effects.
16% picked this
Correct
partial disapproval of the method
Why this is right
This best captures the mixed feelings she has. She approves some of its effects (the conceptual clarity it provides) but disapproves of its lack of real world depth and complexity. It uses a method that "relies heavily on an abstract, philosophical view of ethics". She thinks it would be bad to be totally relativistic (i.e. "whatever YOU feel in the moment is ethical, is ethical"), so she partially approves of having fixed moral principles. But she wants med students to engage in how difficult real world dilemmas will be and learn to "abandon strictly absolute, inviolate sets of moral principles". She wants them to feel greater flexibility in applying moral principles, but she does still want moral principles.
Skill tested: Author's Attitude · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
61% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free