Reading Comprehension

PT114 · S3 · P1 · Q4 Burning Forests

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

Save & drill this skill — build targeted practice sets from questions like this one
Video walkthroughs — watch every question solved step by step
81 official LSATs — as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

The myth persists that in 1492 the Western Hemisphere was an untamed wilderness and that it was European settlers who harnessed and transformed its ecosystems.

Topic

The impact of pre-European Native populations on the forests of the Western Hemisphere, especially through controlled burning.

Framework

Challenge Position

Main Point

Contrary to the myth that the Western Hemisphere was a pristine wilderness before European arrival, Native populations had been actively and extensively managing and modifying forests—especially by controlled burning—which significantly altered ecosystems. *The main idea is introduced with the pivot in the first paragraph: This theme is developed throughout the passage.*

P1: Challenging the "Pristine Wilderness" Myth

The author introduces the persistent myth that Europeans encountered untouched wilderness in 1492, then pivots to say that scholarship actually shows Native populations had already changed the forests significantly, especially through burning. Some researchers disagree, crediting climate change or saying burning was rare.

P2: Evidence for Widespread Controlled Burning

Here, the author lays out evidence that controlled burning was routine, particularly where native populations were dense. The paragraph describes the varied effects of these burns on vegetation, such as creating grassy meadows and a patchwork-like diversity in forest age and types.

P3: Regional and Practical Impacts of Burning

This paragraph dives into how burning affected specific regions. In North America, burning promoted certain plants and converted forests. In the tropics, where natural fires are rare, burning still created distinct forest types that vanished when settlements disappeared. The Nicaraguan pine forests are used as a key example, showing how these patterns map onto settlement history elsewhere, too.

Which one of the following is presented by the author as evidence of controlled burning in the tropics before the arrival of Europeans?

extensive homogeneous forests at high
Opposite
When the author talks about pine-dominant forests at high elevations, she isn't supporting her main point about controlled burning. She's actually making a disclaimer / a concession, that goes against that main point: While there are extensive pine forests in Guatemala and Mexico, these grow in cool / dry / high areas where such vegetation is in large part natural and even prehuman. The evidence for controlled burning are the homogenous pine forests that occur in areas "where warm temperatures and heavy rainfall would naturally favor mixed forests".
13% picked this
Correct
extensive homogeneous forests at low
Why this is right
This is what the final five sentences of the passage are all about, so for a Locate Detail question, this answer involves a lot of synthesis of multiple claims. [Controlled] Burning also influenced forest composition in the tropics. An example is the pine-dominant (i.e. homogenous) forests of Nicaragua, which are warm and wet, so they would naturally be mixed forests (i.e. heterogenous) The question stem asked us what the author presented as evidence of controlled burning in the tropics. These two lines are saying that "these pine-dominant forests of Nicaragua are evidence of controlled burning in the tropics." We now just have to understand that these "pine-dominant forests" are correctly described as homogenous and low elevation. "Homogenous" means "of the same type". Meanwhile, "heterogeneous" is a synonym for "mixed". Thus, if nature favors mixed forests in these warm/wet areas of the tropics, but we're seeing something different, then we're seeing something non-mixed, i.e. "homogenous". We learn that these forests are low elevation because they are contrasted with cool / dry / high forests where it's natural for pine trees to dominate. Also, the final sentence of the passage talks about other forests that are "similarly low elevation". Finally, how do we work in the part of the answer about "before the Europeans arrived"? In the last two sentences it's saying that when Europeans arrived, there was already a correlation between where human settlements were found and where these homogenous forests were unnaturally found. So there had already been controlled burning before they arrived.
Skill tested: Locate Detail · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.
62% picked this
extensive heterogeneous forests at high
Out of Scope: high heterogeneous
There is no mention of extensive heterogeneous high elevation forests in this last paragraph. The high elevation tropical forest mentioned is an "extensive pine forest", which means it's 'homogeneous", not 'heterogeneous'. Also, the reference to high elevation forests is part of the author's disclaimer, not part of the evidence for controlled burning.
3% picked this
extensive heterogeneous forests at low
Out of Scope: low heterogeneous
Extensive heterogeneous low elevation forests (i.e. mixed hardwoods) are found - in areas where humans didn't settle - in areas where settled humans abandoned that land and moved away They are evidence that humans don't or didn't live somewhere. But they're not evidence that controlled burning IS occurring. They are the natural state for warm / wet tropical forests.
7% picked this
extensive sedimentary charcoal accumulations at
Out of Support Window
"Charcoal" is discussed as evidence for controlled burning, in the 2nd paragraph. But that discussion has nothing to do with the Tropical latitudes, nor does it relate to the arrival of Europeans.
15% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

Save and practice this skill

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free