Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT114 S2 Q19 Explanation

Their statements commit Professors

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsAgree/Disagree

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Professor Beckstein: American Sign Language is the native language of many North Americans. Therefore, it is not a foreign language, and for that reason alone, no student should be foreign language requirement by learning it.

Professor Sedley: According to your argument, students should not be allowed to satisfy the university’s foreign language requirement by learning French or Spanish either, since they too are the native languages of many North Americans. Yet many students currently satisfy the requirement by ridiculous to begin prohibiting them from doing so.

What this question is testing

Agree/Disagree

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
19.

Their statements commit Professors Beckstein and Sedley to disagreeing about which one

Answer choices

  1. Unsupported Disagree Position1% picked this

    whether American Sign Language is the native language of a significant number

    We know that B agrees with this, but we can't support that S disagrees with this, especially since S never once talks about ASL.

  2. Unsupported Agree Position5% picked this

    whether any North American whose native language is not English should be allowed to fulfill the university’s foreign language requirement by studying

    We can't derive this extreme claim from either paragraph, because neither author espoused some universal idea about all North Americans whose native language is not English.

  3. Unsupported Agree Position2% picked this

    whether the university ought to retain a foreign

    We wouldn't be able to derive this from either set of statements. They both acknowledge that there is a foreign language requirement, but neither of them editorializes on whether it's a good or bad thing, whether it should be retained to rejected.

  4. Unsupported Agree Position3% picked this

    whether any other universities in North America permit their students to fulfill a foreign language requirement by

    We can't derive this claim from either set of statements, because neither author speaks about other universities.

  5. Correct89% picked this

    whether the fact that a language is the native language of many North Americans justifies prohibiting its use to fulfill

    Why this is right

    This is what we predicted. B agrees with this. He thinks that if X is the native language of many North Americans, then it's not a foreign language, and that if it's not a foreign language, then it can't satisfy the foreign language requirement. So he thinks that if X is the native language of many North Americans, then X can't satisfy the foreign language requirement. We know that S disagrees with this, because she makes the case that there are examples (such as French and Spanish) in which X is the native language of many North Americans, but X can still satisfy the foreign language requirement.

    Skill tested: Agree/Disagree · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free