Logical Reasoning

PT113 · S4 · Q23 Robert: Speed limits on residential

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Robert: Speed limits on residential streets in Crownsbury are routinely ignored by drivers.

Your task

Find the assumption the argument requires in order for its conclusion to hold.

Common trap

Answers that would help the argument but aren't strictly required (sufficient, not necessary).

Winning move

Negate each choice — the right one breaks the argument when negated.

23.

Sheila's response depends on the presupposition that

  1. problems of the kind that

    Trap

    0% picked this

  2. Robert’s proposal is intended to

    Trap

    2% picked this

  3. Correct

    with speed bumps and warning

    Why this is right

    Answer C is correct.

    Skill tested: Necessary Assumption · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

    90% picked this

  4. most of the people who

    Trap

    7% picked this

  5. problems of the kind that

    Trap

    0% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free