Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT113 S2 Q8 Explanation

Conscientiousness is high on most

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsParadox

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Conscientiousness is high on most firms’ list of traits they want in employees. Yet a recent study found that laid-off conscientious individuals are less likely to find jobs within peers who shirked their workplace responsibilities.

What this question is testing

Paradox

Your task

Break the argument into its conclusion and evidence, then do exactly what the question stem asks with that structure.

Common trap

Answers that sound relevant to the topic but don't connect to the argument's actual reasoning.

Winning move

Predict what a right answer must do, then test each choice against the conclusion-evidence gap.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
8.

Each of the following, if true, helps to resolve the apparent paradox

Answer choices

  1. Correct71% picked this

    People who shirk their workplace responsibilities are less likely to keep the jobs they have, so there are more

    Why this is right

    The raw numbers here are completely irrelevant. It wouldn't matter which group there was numerically more of, because the study was talking about one group being less likely to find a job than the other. Whenever we express things as rates or probabilities or percentages or likelihoods, it doesn't matter what the underlying population size is in real numbers. This study is reporting something like, "only 25% of conscientious people were able to find a job within five months, whereas 45% of non-conscientious people were able to". It makes no difference what the real number is for each of those groups.

    Skill tested: Paradox · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  2. Helps Explain7% picked this

    Conscientious people tend to have a greater than average concern with finding the job most suited to

    This gives a reason why conscientious people are more likely to take more than five months to find a job: they're picky! Whereas the un-conscientious will take whatever job they're offered, the conscientious people won't settle. They'll take 8 months if that's what it takes to find the 'right' fit.

  3. Helps Explain5% picked this

    Resentment about having been laid off in spite of their conscientiousness leads some people to

    This gives a reason why conscientious people are less likely to get a job: they're bad at job interviews! They feel so disrespected and under-appreciated from their former job, that they vent frustration and hostility at their job interviews and thus they fail to make a good enough impression to get hired.

  4. Helps Explain5% picked this

    People who are inclined to shirk their workplace responsibilities are more likely to exaggerate their credentials, leading prospective employers to believe

    This gives a reason why un-conscientious people are more likely to get a job sooner: they'll lie about their qualifications. While the conscientious people will tell the truth like, "No, I don't know any programming languages", the un-conscientious will be like, "Sure, I know C++ and Javascript. No prob." Thus, the un-conscientious will be more likely to get hired, since the employer will be impressed by their (fake) credentials.

  5. Helps Explain11% picked this

    Finding a job is less urgent for the conscientious, because they tend to

    This gives a reason why conscientious people are more likely to take more than five months to find a job: they saved up money / they're less desperate. Whereas the un-conscientious will take whatever job they're offered, because they need money desperately, the conscientious people won't settle. They'll take 8 months if that's what it takes to find the 'right' fit. They're not stressed for money yet because they were very responsible and saved up a large "rainy day" fund.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free