Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Easy

PT113 S2 Q14 Explanation

In response to office workers’

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsWeaken

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

In response to office workers’ worries about the health risks associated with using video display terminals (VDTs), researchers asked office workers to estimate both the amount of time they had spent using VDTs and how often they had suffered headaches over the previous year. According to the survey, frequent VDT workers did, leading researchers to conclude that VDTs cause headaches.

What this question is testing

Weaken

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion less likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that look negative but attack a claim the argument never relied on.

Winning move

Find the assumption the argument depends on, then pick the choice that undermines it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
14.

Which one of the following, if true, most undermines the

Answer choices

  1. No Impact5% picked this

    Few of the office workers surveyed participated in regular health programs during the

    This states that few workers participated in health programs, which has no direct link to the correlation between VDT use and headaches, failing to address the causal connection.

  2. No Impact2% picked this

    In their study the researchers failed to ask the workers to distinguish between severe migraine

    This indicates researchers didn’t distinguish between headache severities. The conclusion concerns any headaches linked to VDTs, making this distinction irrelevant to the causal claim.

  3. Strengthens2% picked this

    Previous studies have shown that the glare from VDT screens causes some users

    This claims glare from VDTs causes eyestrain, indirectly supporting the link between VDT use and headaches, aligning with the causal premise under discussion.

  4. Correct82% picked this

    Office workers who experienced frequent headaches were more likely than other workers to overestimate how much time

    Why this is right

    This suggests that those who experience frequent headaches overestimate their VDT usage, pointing to a third factor—misreporting—as a reason for the correlation. This challenges the causal link by suggesting that headaches are independent of actual VDT use.

    Skill tested: Weaken · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Strengthens8% picked this

    Office workers who regularly used VDTs experienced the same amount of job-related stress as workers who

    This claims VDT users experience the same job-related stress as non-users, ruling out job stress as an alternate explanation and lending support to the VDT-headache causal connection.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free