Manuscripts written by first-time

Answer choices

1. A

   Bad Conclusion Match11% picked this

   Challengers generally do not win elections unless the incumbent has become very unpopular. The incumbent in this election has become very unpopular.

   The strength of this conclusion is Possible (may win). The strength of the original conclusion was Probable (unlikely to be taken seriously). That's enough to get rid of this one. Were we to bother reading the premises, we'd see another mismatch. We get our Most premise: Most "challengers who are facing an incumbent that hasn't become very unpopular" do not win elections. The next premise should be saying: Sally is a challenger facing an incumbent who hasn't become very unpopular. And then the conclusion would be saying Sally probably won't win the election.

   11%
2. B

   Correct65% picked this

   Fruit salad that contains bananas is ordinarily a boring dish unless it contains two or more exotic fruits. This fruit salad has bananas in

   Why this is right

   Most A's are B Most "fruit salads that have bananas but one or fewer exotic fruits" are boring. X is A. This fruit salad has bananas and one or fewer exotic fruits. Thus, X is probably B This fruit salad is probably be boring.

   Skill tested: Parallel · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

   65%
3. C

   Weak Premise Match11% picked this

   Thursday’s city council meeting is likely to be poorly attended. Traditionally, council meetings are sparsely attended if zoning issues are the only ones on

   This argument is slightly different from the original because the "most" premise is actually an "all", and it's historical, not present tense. The original argument was saying, "Most things with these traits do not get attention". A historical version would say, "Most things with these traits have not gotten attention". Other than that, this argument is fairly similar to the original, but that difference is enough to make this a weaker match. The other mismatch is that the original "Most" claim had an "except" qualification at the end. In our correct answer, the "Most" claim also has a qualification at the end. For this answer to have better matched, it would need to say something more like, "Traditionally, council meetings are sparely attended if zoning issues are the only ones on the agenda, unless there is free popcorn offered."

   11%
4. D

   Weak Premise Match9% picked this

   The bulk of an estate generally goes to the spouse, if surviving, and otherwise goes to the surviving children. In this case there is

   The original most claim was saying "Most A's are B, unless they're C" -- Most first-time manuscripts are not given serious attention, unless they're written by celebrities. That creates a complex sufficient condition: "Most first-time manuscripts that aren't by celebrities" The most claim in this answer does not have that sort of feature. It's actually saying, "Most estates give the bulk of the value to the spouse" as well as "most estates without a surviving spouse give the bulk of the value to the surviving children". We could potentially re-write the first sentence to match the structure better: most estates give the bulk of the value to the surviving children, unless the spouse is surviving. That would give us, "Most estates that don't have a surviving spouse give the bulk of the value to the surviving children". If we thought of it that way, the argument is actually very similar, but the fact that we'd have to re-write it a bit to make it line up better highlights why the correct answer is more similar.

   9%
5. E

   Bad Conclusion Match5% picked this

   Normally about 40 percent of the deer population will die over the winter unless it is extremely mild. The percentage of the deer population

   The strength of this conclusion is Certain (was not atypically mild). The strength of the original conclusion was Probable (unlikely to be taken seriously). That's enough to get rid of this one. Were we to bother reading the premises, we'd see another mismatch. We get our Most premise: Most "winters that are not extremely mild" kill off 40% of the deer population. The next premise should be saying: This winter was not extremely mild. And then the conclusion would be saying So 40% of the deer population likely died.

   5%