Critic: Emily Dickinson’s poetry demonstrates that meaning cannot reside entirely within a poem itself, but is always the unique result of an interaction between a reader’s system of beliefs and the poem; and, of course, any two readers from different cultures or eras have radically different systems of beliefs.
Premises
(1) Meaning in a Dickinson poem cannot reside entirely within the poem itself; it always emerges from the interaction between a reader's system of beliefs and the poem. (2) Any two readers from different cultures or eras have radically different systems of beliefs.
Evaluate
This is an EXCEPT question — four answers could be true, and one cannot. Combine the two premises: meaning depends on the interaction between reader and poem, AND readers from different cultures or eras have radically different belief systems. So when those readers each interact with the same poem, they're combining the same poem with radically different belief systems, which produces meanings that result from radically different interactions. The claim that two such readers interpret a poem the same way is incompatible with this — the belief systems are radically different, so the meanings they generate cannot be identical.
Goal
Find the answer that says two readers from different eras interpret a poem the same way — that's the one ruled out.