Critic: Emily Dickinson’s poetry demonstrates that meaning cannot reside entirely within a poem itself, but is always the unique result of an interaction between a reader’s system of beliefs and the poem; and, of course, any eras have radically different systems of beliefs.
What this question is testing
Premises
The critic gives us two facts: (1) meaning is always a product of this reader meeting the poem, never the poem alone; and (2) readers from different cultures or eras have radically different belief systems.
Evaluate
Put those together. If meaning depends on the reader's beliefs combined with the poem, and two readers from different eras have radically different beliefs, then the same poem run through those two readers produces meanings shaped by radically different inputs. Those interpretations cannot be the same.
The question asks which answer can't be true — i.e., which answer is ruled out by these premises.
Goal
The right answer is the one where two readers from different eras arrive at the same interpretation — that's exactly what the critic's framework forbids.
Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.