Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Medium

PT112 S4 Q7 Explanation

Critic: Emily Dickinson’s poetry

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsMust be False

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

Critic: Emily Dickinson’s poetry demonstrates that meaning cannot reside entirely within a poem itself, but is always the unique result of an interaction between a reader’s system of beliefs and the poem; and, of course, any eras have radically different systems of beliefs.

What this question is testing

Must be False

Premises

The critic gives us two facts: (1) meaning is always a product of this reader meeting the poem, never the poem alone; and (2) readers from different cultures or eras have radically different belief systems.

Evaluate

Put those together. If meaning depends on the reader's beliefs combined with the poem, and two readers from different eras have radically different beliefs, then the same poem run through those two readers produces meanings shaped by radically different inputs. Those interpretations cannot be the same.

The question asks which answer can't be true — i.e., which answer is ruled out by these premises.

Goal

The right answer is the one where two readers from different eras arrive at the same interpretation — that's exactly what the critic's framework forbids.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
7.

If the critic’s statements are true, each of the following could be

Answer choices

  1. Could Be True11% picked this

    A reader’s interpretation of a poem by Dickinson is affected by someone else’s

    The premises don't restrict whether a reader can be influenced by another person's interpretation. A reader's belief system can be shaped by interactions with other people. Nothing in the stimulus rules this out.

  2. Correct78% picked this

    A modern reader and a nineteenth-century reader interpret one of Shakespeare’s sonnets in

    Why this is right

    This is the answer that cannot be true. A modern reader and a nineteenth-century reader are from different eras. By premise (2), they have radically different belief systems. By premise (1), the meaning each derives from a Shakespeare sonnet is the product of that reader's belief system + the poem. Run radically different belief systems through the same poem, and you cannot get the same interpretation. (B) describes exactly this — same interpretation across radically different eras — which the framework rules out.

    Skill tested: Must be False · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. Could Be True0% picked this

    A reader’s interpretation of a poem evolves

    A reader's belief system can change over time, and the premises don't rule out a reader's own interpretation evolving. Nothing in the stimulus prevents this — it's consistent with meaning being the product of the reader's belief system at the moment of reading.

  4. Could Be True2% picked this

    Two readers from the same era arrive at different interpretations of

    The premises only specify that different cultures or eras produce radically different belief systems. They don't say readers from the same era have identical belief systems. So two same-era readers can absolutely differ in interpretation. Consistent with the stimulus.

  5. Could Be True9% picked this

    A reader’s enjoyment of a poem is enhanced by knowing the poet’s

    The stimulus is about how meaning arises, not about what enhances a reader's enjoyment. There's no contradiction in saying a reader's enjoyment goes up when they learn the poet's own take. Nothing here is ruled out.

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free