Logical ReasoningDifficulty: Hard

PT112 S4 Q18 Explanation

People who have political power

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Logical Reasoning question.

TopicsStrengthen

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Stimulus

People who have political power tend to see new technologies as a means of extending or protecting their power, whereas they generally see new ethical arguments and ideas as a threat to it. Therefore, technical ingenuity usually brings benefits to those who only pain to those who have this inventiveness.

What this question is testing

Strengthen

Your task

Find the choice that makes the argument's conclusion more likely to be true.

Common trap

Answers that are consistent with the argument but add no real support, or that strengthen a claim the argument doesn't make.

Winning move

Locate the gap between evidence and conclusion, then pick the choice that closes it.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
18.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most strengthens

Answer choices

  1. Weakens, if anything7% picked this

    Those who offer new ways of justifying current political power often reap the benefits of

    We never talked about "new ways of justifying current political power", but that sounds like it potentially belongs to the category of ethical ingenuity. A lot of ethical arguments are made in order to rationalize and tolerate the current power structure. The author is arguing that ethical inventiveness brings only pain, but this answer is speaking to a situation where it brought benefit to the innovator.

  2. Correct65% picked this

    Politically powerful people tend to reward those who they believe are useful to them and to punish those who

    Why this is right

    This connects language from the Premise to that of the Conclusion. We were looking for ideas like, "If politically powerful people think your new thing could extend/protect their power (i.e. your new thing would be useful to them), then it brings you benefit. If they consider it a threat, it brings you pain (i.e. punishment)." To think this answer is relevant, we have to accept that "extending / protecting the power of the powerful" would be something the powerful "believe is useful to them". And we have to accept that "punishing" people they consider a threat could match up with "brings pain to these people". Both of those feel like very safe, adjacent meanings.

    Skill tested: Strengthen · how this choice captures the argument's function is the move to repeat next time.

  3. No Impact17% picked this

    Ethical inventiveness and technical ingenuity are never possessed by the

    The author doesn't care whether these two things are always separate, always together, or somewhere in between. I can say "Exercise usually brings benefits to those who engage in it, whereas excessive drinking brings only harm to those who have this behavior." That doesn't preclude the possibility of people who bring benefit to themselves while exercising each day and then bring harm to themselves each night by drinking too much.

  4. Weakens, if anything2% picked this

    New technologies are often used by people who strive to defeat those who currently

    We had a premise that said powerful people see new technologies usually as a means of extending / protecting their power. Meanwhile, this answer is saying that new technologies often are used by people trying to subvert the powerful. So this answer seems to undermine the author's premise.

  5. Too Weak9% picked this

    Many people who possess ethical inventiveness conceal their novel ethical arguments for fear of retribution

    This answer strengthens somewhat, because it adds plausibility to the claim that ethical ingenuity brings only pain to those who have it. But when we compare this to the correct answer, it loses on two levels: 1) The correct answer deals with both halves of the conclusion. This answer only deals with the 2nd half. 2) This answer is weaker in terms of strength of language. "Many" means something unspecific like "at least 5-10 people". The correct answer uses "tend to" which refers to "more than 50% of cases".

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free