Reading ComprehensionDifficulty: Hard

PT112 S2 P4 Q21 Explanation

South African Law

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

TopicsMain PointLaw

Keep going in LSAT Lab

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Full official LSAT questions are available through LawHub. This page provides LSAT Lab's explanation, strategy, and review tools without republishing the full official question.

Passage

With the elimination of the apartheid system, South Africa now confronts the transition to a rights-based legal system in a constitutional democracy. Among lawyers and judges, exhilaration over the legal tools soon to be available is tempered by uncertainty about how to use them. The changes in the legal system are significant, which citizens can challenge any law or administrative decision on the basis of their constitutional rights.

South African lawyers are concerned about the difficulty of fostering a rights-based culture in a multiracial society containing a wide range of political and personal beliefs simply by including a bill of rights in the constitution and establishing the means for its defense. Because the bill of rights has been drawn in experience in developing a body of precedent that will address the particular needs of its citizens.

South Africa must also contend with the image of the law held by many of its citizens. Because the law in South Africa has long been a tool of racial oppression, many of its citizens have come to view obeying the law as implicitly sanctioning an illegitimate, brutal government. Among these South oppression but instead a way to bring about change and help further the cause of justice.

What this question is testing

Main Point

Your task

Capture the passage's overall primary point — the claim everything else supports.

Common trap

Answers that are true but too narrow (a single paragraph) or too broad (beyond the passage's scope).

Winning move

Summarize the whole passage in one sentence first, then match it to a choice.

Reading along? Open the full official question in LawHub — we show a fragment here and keep the reasoning in our own words.

The question
21.

Which one of the following most completely and accurately states the main point

Answer choices

  1. Too Strong13% picked this

    Following the elimination of the apartheid system in South Africa, lawyers, judges, and citizens will need to abandon their posture of opposition to law

    Too Strong: need to abandon Wrong Emphasis: too narrow This is borrowing heavily from the final couple sentences of the passage, which is sometimes a trap answer pattern with choice (A). They know these last couple ideas are still ringing in people's ears as they read choice (A). This answer is way too specific and extreme, making it seem like the #1 thing the author had to say was a piece of advice that judges, lawyers and citizens need to abandon their posture of opposition. Lawyers and judges were never said to have a posture of opposition to law; that was just citizens. And this idea is far too narrow. We need a broader sentiment that sounds like "this period of infancy for South Africa's new constitutional democracy is going to be a tricky one when it comes to determining and asserting constitutionally protected rights".

  2. Too Strong: to succeed, they must11% picked this

    If the new legal system in South Africa is to succeed, lawyers, judges, and citizens must learn to challenge parliamentary decisions based on their

    The final sentence of the passage does say "in order to succeed", but then it says "the government will need to show citizens that the legal system is no longer a tool of oppression". It doesn't say "everybody needs to learn to challenge parliamentary decisions". This answer is just a word-salad that takes the beginning of the final sentence and then jams in some wording from the 3rd sentence of the passage. This passage doesn't boil down neatly to one piece of advice. It should just sound like a more general statement that "This new learning period will be a tricky one. Fingers crossed."

  3. Wrong Emphasis: too narrow5% picked this

    Whereas in the past the parliament was both the initiator and arbiter of laws in South Africa, under the new constitution these powers will

    This doesn't capture the main gist that "this period where the legal system and the citizenry try to figure out how to navigate their brand new rights is going to be a tricky one". It just tells us a very, very, very narrow fact.

  4. Correct65% picked this

    Despite the lack of relevant legal precedents and the public’s antagonistic relation to the law, South Africa is moving from a legal system where

    Why this is right

    This answer is written a little weirdly, but it's our best available. The opening clause captures the discussion in the 2nd paragraph (lack of relevant legal precedents) and the 3rd paragraph (public's antagonistic relation to the law). The main clause captures the information we learned in the 1st paragraph (South Africa moved from a system in which parliament had utmost control to one in which citizens' rights are protected by a constitution). This answer, more than any other, has language in it that maps to each of the three paragraphs.

    Skill tested: Main Point · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

  5. Too Narrow6% picked this

    While South Africa’s judges will have to look initially to other countries to provide interpretations for its new bill of rights, eventually it must

    This answer says something true from the passage, but it's just one of the several reasons why the passage thinks this early period of the new constitutional democracy will be tough. 1. lawyers aren't used to interpretative way of looking at law 2. the multiracial society has a wide range of political and personal beliefs, and the language of the bill of rights is written in very general terms -- how will they find agreement? 3. they will look to interpretations found in foreign law, being careful to remember the unique needs of the countries where those precedents came from vs. the particular needs of South Africa. 4. the citizens historically have a distrustful relationship to the law, so it will take a lot of work to reform that image

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free