Reading Comprehension

PT112 · S2 · P3 · Q16 Hormones

A free, expert breakdown of this official LSAT Reading Comprehension question.

  • Save & drill this skill build targeted practice sets from questions like this one

  • Video walkthroughs watch every question solved step by step

  • 81 official LSATs as questions, timed sections & full-length tests

Discussions of how hormones influence behavior have generally been limited to the effects of gonadal hormones on reproductive behavior and have emphasized the parsimonious arrangement whereby the same hormones involved in the biology of reproduction also influence sexual behavior.

Topic

Hormones and their role in both reproductive and homeostatic (fluid balance) behaviors

Framework

Old / New

Main Point

Previously, people mainly focused on how reproductive hormones affect sexual behavior, but now it’s clear that other hormones, specifically those involved in fluid balance (like vasopressin), also play an important role in controlling behaviors such as water and salt consumption. ( — middle of P1)

P1: Challenging the Narrow Focus on Hormones

Most research has looked at how reproductive (gonadal) hormones affect sexual behavior, but now scientists realize that hormones involved in regulating body fluids (homeostasis) also influence behavior, like thirst and salt appetite. Homeostasis keeps plasma osmolality (solute concentration) steady by tweaking water and sodium intake and output whenever even small changes arise.

P2: How Homeostatic Hormones Control Thirst and Water/Salt Balance

This paragraph explains how water and solute levels are managed in the body through both physiological and behavioral responses. For example, if you have too much water in your body, the hormone vasopressin gets suppressed so your body can get rid of the excess through urine and you stop feeling thirsty. If your blood is too salty, vasopressin gets released to conserve water and increase thirst, so you’ll drink more and dilute the salts. Thirst kicks in only after the body’s initial physiological measures (like vasopressin release) have already tried to fix the imbalance.

16.

The author of the passage cites the relationship between gonadal hormones and reproductive behavior in order to

  1. review briefly the history of

    Out of Scope

    Out of Scope: the history of research The author just states that, "prior to the present discussion, most discussions about how hormones influence behavior have focused on how gonadal hormones influence sexual behavior". She doesn't provide any history on the research that went into that finding. Also, peptides aren't even on the scene yet, so the point she's making about gonadal hormones is not the same as what she'll be saying later about peptide hormones.

    9% picked this

  2. decry the fact that previous

    Too Strong: decry

    We can keep this on a first pass, but ultimately it's too strong to say the author was decrying the previous focus of hormone discussions. It wasn't a tragic lament. It was just a statement. The author isn't necessarily blaming us for having limited our discussions to the relationship between gonadal hormones and sexual behavior. It's only NOW become clear that other hormones are worth talking about. And the author's first sentence wasn't complaining that previous research has concentrated on the relationship between hormones and behavior. It was "complaining" that previous research on the relationship between hormones and behavior has only focused on the relationship between gonadal hormones and sexual behavior.

    10% picked this

  3. Correct

    establish the emphasis of earlier

    Why this is right

    This accurately describes both what the first sentence says (it establishes the emphasis of earlier research, which was generally limited to talking about how gonadal hormones affected sexual behavior) before then pivoting into the new research we're here to discuss (other hormones can also affect behavior!).

    Skill tested: Local Purpose · how this choice captures the passage's function is the move to repeat next time.

    67% picked this

  4. introduce a commonly held misconception

    Out of Scope: refuting

    The author isn't refuting what's said in the first sentence. She's just adding onto it. Our discussions of how hormones influenced behavior usually only looked at how one type of hormone affected one type of behavior. But now we know about other hormones and other ways they can affect our behavior.

    13% picked this

  5. summarize the main findings of

    Contradicted: recent research

    The sentence about gonadal hormones is about past research, not recent research, so the author isn't summarizing recent research by talking about gonadal hormones.

    1% picked this

Continue the review in LSAT Lab

Save this question, watch the video walkthrough, and drill similar questions in your LSAT Lab account.

LSAT Lab

Turn this review into a targeted study plan.

Save this question, drill more like it, watch the video walkthrough, and track your progress in your LSAT Lab account.

Start practicing free